Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-2678 - (PC) Barron v. Whitfield


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-2678 - (PC) Barron v. Whitfield
November 18, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/17/11 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff will be assessed an initial filing fee of $20.00. The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint, not to exceed 30 pages in length including exhibits, within 28 days from the date of service of this order. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel 3 is DENIED without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
November 18, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/17/11 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect an initial partial filing fee of $20.00 and thereafter, forward payment from the prison trust account of Anthony Raul Barron to the clerk until the balance of $330 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC PrisonerPayment Orders ). (Dillon, M)
March 13, 2012
PDF | More
xhibits.(Yin, K)ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/12/2012 ORDERING that the amended complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file a second amended complaint within 28 days; the second amended complaint may not exceed 30 pages in length including e
September 24, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/24/2012 ORDERING that 16 motion to appoint counsel is DENIED without prejudice; and RECOMMENDING that all defendants and claims be dismissed except the claim of retaliation against defendant Alcaraz and Fowler. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
March 12, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/12/2013 ORDERING 17 Plaintiff may proceed with the retaliation claim against Defendant Whitfield and the discrimination claim against Defendant Alcaraz; Plaintiff is given LEAVE to amend his Eighth Amendment claim within 20 days consistent with this Order; Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Reader, L)
July 1, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/28/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 30 motion for 20-day extension of time; plaintiff's 4/22/13 third amended complaint is DEEMED TIMELY FILED; and DENYING, without prejudice to its renewal, defendant's 34 request for screening. (Yin, K)
December 19, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/18/13 ORDERING for the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion 31 for Reconsideration in part and DENIES in part. Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Defendant Alcaraz is reinstated. (Becknal, R)
August 4, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/4/14 GRANTING 51 Motion. All discovery shall be stayed until the Court rules on DefendantAlcarazs motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust.(Dillon, M)
March 6, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/5/15 RECOMMENDING that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Alcaraz, ECF No. 41, premised on plaintiffs alleged failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, should be granted. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Whitfield, Swarthout and Cate, ECF No. 62, premised on plaintiffs alleged failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, should be granted as to defendants Swarthout and Cate, and denied as to defendant Whitfield. Plaintiffs claims in this action against defendants Alcaraz, Swarthout and Cate, should be dismissed without prejudice. This action should proceed only on plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Whitfield. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
June 10, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/9/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 69 are ADOPTED in FULL; The motion for summary judgment 41 filed by defendant Alcaraz, premised on plaintiff's alleged failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, is GRANTED. The motion for summary judgment 62 filed by defendants Whitfield, Swarthout and Cate, premised on plaintiff's alleged failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, is GRANTED as to defendants Swarthout and Cate, and DENIED as to defendant Whitfield. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Alcaraz, Swarthout and Cate are DISMISSED without prejudice. This action shall proceed only on plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Whitfield. (Reader, L)
July 27, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/27/2015 DENYING without prejudice, Plaintiff's 75 motion for appointment of counsel. (Reader, L)
January 6, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/05/16 ordering that the 1/29/16 deadline for filing dispositive motions in this action is vacated until further order of this court. (Plummer, M)
May 4, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/04/16 granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion to Compel. Within 30 days after the filing date of this order, defendant shall serve on plaintiff the following additional discovery, (See order for further details). Also within 30 days after the filing date of this order, defendant shall file with the court a copy of all matters served on plaintiff pursuant to this order. Subject to the above exceptions, discovery has closed in this action; the deadline for filing dispositive motions is hereby extended to 10/14/16. (Plummer, M)
September 30, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/29/16 granting in part and denying in part 89 Motion to Compel. (See order for further details.) Plaintiff's remaining discovery challenges and request for sanctions are denied. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to 12/09/16. (Plummer, M)
November 2, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/01/16 ordering that, within fourteen (14) days after the filing date of this order, defendant Whitfield shall serve on plaintiff the following documents: An unredacted copy of the Miranda Admonishment section of page 36 of the PDF document entitled Interviews and Interrogations for the CDC Investigator. Matter other than the text following the heading Miranda Admonishment may be redacted from page 36 of the PDF document. A copy of the CDCR-128B Form dated September 23, 2016, found at page 11 of Appeal Log No. SOL-06-03714, redacted to exclude any information that could identify the nonparty inmate. Plaintiffs motion to compel, 89, is denied as to all other materials reviewed in camera pursuant to this courts previous order, 92. The dispositive motion deadline in this action remains December 9, 2016. (Plummer, M) Modified on 11/2/2016 (Plummer, M).
November 29, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/28/16 ORDERING that defendant's 99 request this action proceed without application of Local Rule 230(l) is GRANTED. The parties shall notice, file, serve and brief their dispositive motions in accordance with the deadlines and requirements set forth in Local Rule 230(b)-(h).(Dillon, M)
January 9, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/9/17 ORDERING that defendant shall, on or before Friday, January 13, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. (noon), file and serve a statement (set forth in defendant's reply or a supplemental reply) that addresses the impact of Judge Mendez' assessments of plaintiff's claims of custodial interrogation and retaliation on the merits of the pending motions for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to rename this case to indicate that defendant J. Whitfield is the sole remaining defendant.(Dillon, M)
January 30, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/27/2017 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 102 motion for summary judgment be denied; defendant's 103 motion for summary judgment be granted; and judgment be entered for defendant. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Yin, K)