Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-1287 - Morgan v. Johnson


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-1287 - Morgan v. Johnson
May 15, 2012
PDF | More
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/14/2012 ORDERING that case 2:09-cv-2649-LKK-DAD and 2:12-cv-1287-LKK-DAD are RELATED. Because the cases are already assigned to the same district judge and magistrate judge, this order is issued for informational purposes only and shall have no effect on the status of the cases. (Zignago, K.)
August 1, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/31/12 ORDERING that the defendant bring on a formal motion to consolidate within 14 days; response due within 21 days; reply within 10 days thereafter. The motion will be heard on 10/1/12 at 10:00 am. (Manzer, C)
October 4, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/3/12 ORDERING GRANTING 13 Motion to Consolidate Cases; Morgan v. Napolitano, case no. 2:09-cv- 02649, and Morgan v. Napolitano, case no. 2:12-cv-01287, are hereby CONSOLIDATED. The complaint currently filed in case no. 2:12-cv-01287 1 shall become the operative complaint in the consolidated action. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 7 days of entry of this order solely to allege an additional cause of action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (currently pleaded in the Fifth Amended Complaint in case no. 2:09-cv-02649 (docket no. 57), but not pleaded in the complaint in case no. 2:12-cv-01287 1). Defendant shall file a response to the consolidated complaint (whether amended by plaintiff or not) within 21 days of entry of this order. Any motion filed by defendant in response to the consolidated complaint may only address new matter pleaded in the consolidated complaint and not pleaded in the Fifth Amended Complaint currently filed in case no. 2:09-cv-02649 (docket no. 57). Plaintiff's cause of action for judicial review of the Merit Systems Protection Board order dated April 13, 2012 shall be tried to the court separately following trial on all other causes of action herein. The parties may not refer to the proceedings that led to this order, or the order itself, in any proceedings before a jury herein. Plaintiff's and defendant's motions to amend the status (pretrial scheduling) order currently in effect in case no. 2:09-cv-02649 (docket no. 68) are DENIED as moot. The status (pretrial scheduling) order currently in effect in case no. 2:09-cv-02649 (docket no. 68) is VACATED. A status (pretrial scheduling) conference is set for November 13, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall file status reports no later than 14 days before the status conference.(Matson, R)
May 30, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/29/13 ORDERING that the Defendant shall produced the requested documents, allow plaintiff to view the original Administrative Inquiry Report in question and provide the further discovery responses ordered above within twenty-one days of the date of service of this order. All responses provided by defendant shall be produced subject to a stipulated protective order. (Becknal, R)
June 28, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Quash and protective order AND denying 32 Motion for Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/28/13. (Kaminski, H)
July 24, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/2/2013 DENYING 33 Motion for Reconsideration. (Donati, J)
September 12, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/11/2013. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file, by 9/16/2013, a Response to defendants Statement of Undisputed Facts which satisfies requirements of Local Rule 260(b). Plaintiff additionally GRANTED leave to file Statement of Disputed Facts, by 9/16/2013, conforming to requirements set forth in Local Rule 260(b). In order to facilitate Court's consideration of this matter, plaintiff is encouraged, though not required, to file, by 9/20/2013, a revised Opposition that, where possible, includes citations to his Response to Statement of Undisputed Facts and/or to anyStatement of Disputed Facts. As a sanction for plaintiff's failure to comply with Local Rules, defendant is GRANTED additional time to file Reply, which, if defendant chooses to file one, will be due by 10/4/2013. The hearing on defendant's 40 Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 11/4/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). (Marciel, M)
October 31, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/30/2013 DIRECTING the parties to file opening briefs, by 11/12/2013, addressing the matters raised herein; DIRECTING the parties to file reply briefs, if any, by 11/18/2013; CONTINUING the Motion Hearing as to 40 Motion for Summary Judgment to 12/9/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; CONTINUING the Final Pretrial Conference to 1/21/2014 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; VACATING the trial date of 3/18/2014. (Michel, G)
December 19, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/19/2013 ORDERING that Summary judgment is GRANTED to defendant on plaintiff's claims under the ADEA for (i) wrongful termination, (ii) compensatory damages for pain, suffering, and/or emotional distress, and (iii) liquidated damages. In all other respects, defendant's 40 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
January 17, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/16/2014 DIRECTING the parties to promptly meet and confer to resolve each of the factual disputes listed herein and to file a joint statement by 1/31/2014, identifying all disputes so resolved and setting forth the agreed-upon resolution; DIRECTING each party to file by 2/14/2014 at 4:30 PM, a brief setting forth (i) each remaining disputed fact, (ii) position on the disputed fact, (iii) the element of the relevant cause of action or affirmative defense to which the fact relates or corresponds, if applicable, (iv) legal authority for said position, and (v) any argument in support of stated position (see order for format requirements); DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to substitute Jeh Johnson for Defendant Janet Napolitano. (Michel, G)
January 29, 2014
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/28/2014 for extension of time to file Status Report. Parties are GRANTED an extension to and until 2/7/2014 within which to file their Amended Joint Statement re 64 Stipulation and Proposed Order. [STIPULATION and ORDER initially filed in the consolidated action 2:09-cv-2649 in ERROR. RE-FILED in this action to complete the record.] (Donati, J)
April 10, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/9/2014 ORDERING the portion of the 70 Pretrial Order (Tentative) quoted in this order is AMENDED to read: "As to each exhibit, each party is ordered to exchange copies of the exhibit not later than August 15, 2014. Each party is then granted fourteen (14) days to file with the court and serve on opposing counsel any objections to said exhibits"; the sentence at page 28, lines 5-6 of the Pretrial order (Tentative) is AMENDED to read: "The trial will be reassigned to another judge subsequent to August 30, 2014."(Waggoner, D)
July 28, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/25/14 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to randomly reassign this case to another district judge for all further proceedings, making appropriate adjustments in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for such reassignment. This case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley; the new case number is 2:14-cv-1287 TLN/DAD. (Kastilahn, A)
January 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/06/16 ORDERING that, due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the 03/07/16 trial date and 01/14/16 Pretrial Conference are VACATED; the parties are to meet and confer and are to file a joint statement within 30 days if they a settlement conference would be beneficial and whether they would like to consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in order to have their trial concluded in a more timely matter. (Benson, A)
January 5, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/4/2018 DENYING 91 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Status Report within 30 days of this Order indicating their readiness to proceed to trial and proposing trial dates. (Hunt, G)