Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-2273 - (HC) Martinez v. Director of CDCR


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-2273 - (HC) Martinez v. Director of CDCR
December 10, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/7/2012 GRANTING petitioner's 6 motion to proceed IFP ; DIRECTING respondent to file a response to petitioner's 9/4/2012 motion for stay and abeyance within 28 days, petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 14 days thereafter; DENYING, without prejudice, petitioner's 3 motion for appointment of counsel; the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, the form Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge, a copy of the habeas petition, and a copy of the motion for stay and abeyance on Michael Farrell. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
August 7, 2013
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/06/13 recommending that petitioner's motion for a stay and abeyance 4 be denied; and petitioner be directed to file a second amended petition containing only his exhausted claims within 30 days of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. Motion for Stay and Abeyance 4 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
September 9, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/6/13. The 4 Motion to Stay is DENIED. Second amended petition due within 30 days. (Manzer, C)
February 7, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/6/2014 DENYING respondent's 51 motion for relief from default, as unnecessary. (Yin, K)
May 20, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/19/14 ORDERING that Petitioners motion to compel discovery (Doc. No. 37) is DENIED without prejudice to its sua sponte renewal by the court; Petitioners motion for an extension of time to file a traverse (Doc. No. 58) is GRANTED. Petitioners traverse (Doc. No. 61) is deemed timely filed; Petitioners motion for leave to file an oversized brief in support of his traverse (Doc. No. 60) is denied as unnecessary; and this matter is now submitted for decision. (Dillon, M)
May 12, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 5/11/2015. Petitioner's 34 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and Court is DECLINING to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Clerk to enter Judgment accordingly. (Marciel, M)
March 31, 2016
PDF | More
CJA 20 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 3/12/2016 ADDING Attorney Jennifer Mikaere Sheetz for Derek Martinez effective 2/19/2016 nunc pro tunc re 77 USCA Order. (Michel, G.)
March 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 03/29/17 ORDERING that Martinez's 80 request for an indicative ruling is GRANTED; within 14 days, Martinez shall inform the USCA that this Court has found that his motion raises a substantial issue. Upon remand, the Court will set a briefing schedule on the motion (cc: USCA). (Benson, A)
June 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 6/5/2017 ORDERING the petitioner to file a Motion to Vacate Judgment pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 60(b) by 7/5/2017; ORDERING the respondent to file an opposition to said motion by 8/4/2017; ORDERING the petitioner to file any reply by 8/18/2017. (cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) (Michel, G.)
September 28, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/28/2017 VACATING the hearing on 87 Motion to Vacate Judgment set for 9/29/2017; ORDERING the respondent to file a surreply to 93 Reply to Response to Motion by 10/9/2017. (Michel, G.)
October 12, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 10/12/17, DENYING 87 the Motion to Vacate Judgment without prejudice to Martinez obtaining authorization from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a second or successive habeas petition raising the new DNA evidence in this Court. The Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. (Kastilahn, A)