Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-329 - USA v. Estrada-Rivas


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-329 - USA v. Estrada-Rivas
September 27, 2013
PDF | More
DETENTION ORDER as to Pedro Estrada-Rivas signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/27/13. (Becknal, R)[2:13-mj-00302-CKD]
November 26, 2013
PDF | More
JUDGMENT and COMMITMENT as to Pedro Estrada-Rivas signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/26/2013. (Krueger, M)
September 25, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/24/14 as to Pedro Estrada-Rivas ordering respondent is directed to file an answer within 30 days of the effective date of this order. Movant's traverse, if any, is due on or before 30 days from the date respondent's answer is filed. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order, together with a copy of movant's motion on the United States Attorney or his authorized representative. (cc: Nirav Desai, U.S. Attorney) (Plummer, M)
November 9, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/8/16 as to Pedro Estrada-Rivas RECOMMENDING that 19 MOTION to VACATE, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 be dismissed for movants failure to keep the court apprised of his current address (see Local Rules 182(f) and 110); and the Clerk of the Court be directed to close the companion civil case No. 2:14-cv-1686 TLN DB. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
December 6, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/5/16 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed November 9, 2016, are adopted in full; this § 2255 motion (ECF No. 19) is dismissed for movant's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address (see Local Rules 182(f) and 110); the court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the companion civil case, No. 2:14-cv-1686 TLN DB. (Becknal, R)