Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-1158 - USA v. EDF Resource Capital, Inc., et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-1158 - USA v. EDF Resource Capital, Inc., et al
August 14, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/13/13 ORDERING that the hearing on the Motions (EFC Nos. 62, 68, 70) and the Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to 9/23/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. The deadlines for filing oppositions to these motions (8/26/2013) and replies, if any (9/3/2013),remain unchanged. The deadline for filing status reports is changed to 9/9/2013. (Kastilahn, A)
August 26, 2013
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/23/13: Scheduling Conference RESET for 11/4/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. HEARING as to 68 Motion, 70 MOTION, 62 MOTION RESET for 11/4/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kaminski, H)
October 9, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/8/13 ORDERING that all hearing dates, filing dates and the scheduling conference in this matter are VACATED. When Plaintiff's employees and its counsel are permitted to resume their duties in this case, the parties are DIRECTED to meet-and-confer and submit a joint stipulation setting forth a proposed schedule. (Manzer, C)
October 31, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/30/13 ORDERING that the Scheduling Conference will be held on 4/14/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 4, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/3/14 ORDERING as follows: The motions to retain this case may be decided based upon the papers, and accordingly, the hearing scheduled for 2/10/14 is VACATED; Defendant's and proposed intervenor's motions to retain this case 62 & 70 are DENIED, and this matter is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case; the hearing on the motion to intervene 68 is hereby VACATED. That motion is also referred to the Magistrate Judge; The dates previously set by this court in its 10/31/13 order are hereby VACATED. (Becknal, R)
September 6, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 09/06/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to parties' 100 Stipulation, all hearings are VACATED and actions STAYED on any pending motions, including the 68 Motion to Intervene 90 and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and a further status report shall be provided to the Court by 03/15/17 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (Benson, A)
March 16, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/15/17 ORDERING that stay of all actions on any pending motions is continued (ECF 101), including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the United States (ECF 90), which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed. A further status report shall be provided to the Court by 6/15/2017 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (Kastilahn, A)
June 16, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER CONTINUING STAY signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/15/2017 ORDERING That stay of all actions on any pending motions is CONTINUED 107, including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore 68 and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the US 90, which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and a further status report shall be provided to the Court by 9/15/2017 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (Reader, L)
September 18, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/15/17 GRANTING a STAY of all actions on any pending motions, including the Motion to Intervene (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims (ECF 90), which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and A further STATUS REPORT shall be provided to the Court by December 14, 2017 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time.(Becknal, R)
December 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/14/2017 CONTINUING STAY of Pending Motions. A further status report shall be provided to the Court by 3/14/2018, if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (York, M)
March 16, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/15/2018 ORDERING 113 that the stay of all actions on any pending motions is CONTINUED, including 68 the Motion to Intervene, and 90 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; a further status report shall be provided to the Court by 6/14/2018 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time; the parties should be prepared to move forward on this case if it is not resolved by 6/14/2018 and any further stay request will be disfavored by the Court. (Reader, L)
June 18, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/15/2018 ORDERING the CONTINUING STAY of Pending Motions. A further status report shall be provided to the Court by 6/29/2018, if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (Washington, S)
July 2, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/29/2018 APPROVING 119 Stipulation and DISMISSING Case With Prejudice, with all sides bearing their own attorneys' and experts' fees and all costs. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)