Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-1834 - Shannon v. County of Sacramento, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-1834 - Shannon v. County of Sacramento, et al.
December 13, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/10/2013 GRANTING in part 7, 8 Motions to Dismiss; DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND the plaintiff's state law claims; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE the plaintiff's claims for punitive damage under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND the plaintiff's remaining claims for municipal liability against County of Sacramento asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND the plaintiff's medical deliberate indifference and section 1985(3) claims; DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND any other claims for relief; GRANTING the plaintiff thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. (Michel, G)
July 28, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/26/2014 ORDERING that Defendants' 24 and 25 Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's 23 First Amended Complaint are GRANTED. Plaintiff is given leave to amend. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date on which this Order is filed to file an amended complaint in which he is to address the deficiencies in the referenced claims. Plaintiff is advised that with respect to a future amended complaint, leave to amend may be denied "where a plaintiff has repeatedly failed to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed." Plaintiff is further notified that this action may be dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(b) if he fails to file an amended complaint within the prescribed time period. (Zignago, K.)
October 28, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/27/2015 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 37, 38 Motions to Dismiss; FINDING that the plaintiff states a claim under the Eighth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Dr. Richard Bauer and Dr. Michael Fox; DISMISSING all additional claims under other Constitutional provisions including the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986, 1988 with prejudice; DISMISSING the plaintiff's claims against Defendant County of Sacramento with leave to amend; DISMISSING the plaintiff's claims under state law with leave to amend; GRANTING the plaintiff 30 days to file and serve a Third Amended Complaint; ORDERING the defendants to file and serve a responsive pleading within 30 days of service of the Third Amended Complaint. (Michel, G.)
December 8, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/7/15 ORDERING Plaintiff Michael Shannon's motion for an extension of time to find a new attorney 53 is GRANTED. The times to file an amended complaint and responsive pleadings, stated in the Court's previous Order 52, are VACATED.Plaintiff may file and serve an amended complaint within 60 days of entry of the instant Order. Defendants may file a responsive pleading within 30 days of service of the amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within 60 days, this matter will proceed onthe sole claim that was not dismissed by the Court's previous Order 52: deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Defendants Dr. Michael Fox and Dr. Richard Bauer. The remaining claims will be dismissed with prejudice. (Becknal, R)
June 13, 2016
PDF | More
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/10/16: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/1/2017. Discovery due by 3/31/2017. Dispositive Motions filed by 10/5/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/11/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Jury Trial set for 3/5/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)