Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-035 - Stanley v. City of Elk Grove et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-035 - Stanley v. City of Elk Grove et al
April 10, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/9/2014 ORDERING that the Court GRANTS BCI's 5 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fifth Cause of Action with leave to amend and GRANTS the City's 6 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's FAC with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file his Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. Defendants shall file their responsive pleadings to the Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days from the date it is filed. If Plaintiff elects not to file an Amended Complaint, the case will proceed against BCI on the FAC with Plaintiff's remaining claims. (Zignago, K.)
July 30, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/30/2014 ORDERING 21 the Court GRANTS the City's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend. This case will proceed against the remaining Defendant.(Reader, L)
October 20, 2014
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER to file third amended complaint signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/20/14. (Manzer, C)
October 14, 2015
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER RE DISCOVERY signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/14/2015 ORDERING that the discovery cut-off is CONTINUED from 12/4/2015 to 2/1/2016. (Zignago, K.)
January 22, 2016
PDF | More
SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER RE DISCOVERY signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/22/16 ORDERING that the Discovery cut-off, as set forth in the Court's 10/14/15 Order, is CONTINUED from 2/1/16 to 3/1/2016. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 25, 2016
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER 45 to allow filing of Fourth Amended Complaint signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/25/2016. It is further stipulated that defendants WAIVE notice and service of Fourth Amended Complaint. That said, defendants shall NOT be required to serve further Answer or responsive pleading. All denials, responses, and affirmative defenses contained 36 Answer to 32 Third Amended Complaint shall be responsive to Fourth Amended Complaint. (Marciel, M)
March 11, 2016
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/10/2016 ORDERING that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees. CASE CLOSED. (Attachments: # (1) Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement) (Zignago, K.)