Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-338 - (PC) Brown v. Sagireddy et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-338 - (PC) Brown v. Sagireddy et al
March 12, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/11/14 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
August 21, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Dexter Brown signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/20/2014. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
September 4, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/4/2014 ORDERING the Clerk to send plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet in the instant case as a one time courtesy to plaintiff.(Yin, K)
September 5, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/05/14 ORDERING that the clerk randomly assign a District Judge to this case. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant Brown be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
October 22, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/22/2014 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendant Edmund G. Brown is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Donati, J)
April 13, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/10/15 ORDERING plaintiff's requests for the court to order an investigation 20, 27 into his allegation are denied. Plaintiff's request for subpoena forms 30 is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to provide plaintiff a signed but otherwise blank subpoena duces tecum form with this order. Plaintiff's request for status of his amended complaint and opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss 34 is granted to the extent that the court advises that both documents have been received and will be addressed in due course. Plaintiff's motion for recusal 42 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's documents 20, 27, 28, 35, 36, 44, 47, 48, 49, construed as motions for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction be denied. Motions 20, 27, 28, 35, 36, 44, 47, 48, 49 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
June 15, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/12/15: The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2015 (ECF No. 50), are adopted in full. Plaintiff's documents (ECF Nos. 20, 27, 28, 35, 36, 44, 47, 48, 49), construed as motions for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are denied.(Kaminski, H)
June 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/15/15 ORDERING that defendant Sagireddy shall file and serve a response to the motion for preliminary injunction within fourteen days of the filing of this order. Plaintiff shall have seven days from service of the response to file a reply. (Dillon, M)
July 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/16/15 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion to extend his deadline to file a reply in support of his motion to compel (ECF No. 57) is denied. If plaintiff still seeks additional time to file a reply, within seven days of the filing of this order he may file another motion for extension that establishes excusable neglect for the untimely motion and good cause for granting the extension.(Dillon, M)
September 24, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/23/15 ordering plaintiff's motion to recuse 62 is denied. The First Amended Complaint 39 is submitted for screening, and defendants' motions to dismiss 24, 25 are denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion to conduct discovery 52 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time 64 is granted and his reply in support of his motion for preliminary injunction 66 is deemed untimely. (Plummer, M)
February 5, 2016
PDF | More
and Foronda be ordered to respond to Counts I, II, and III of the first amended complaint, as set forth above in Section III, within 30 days from the date of the district judge's review and adoption of the instant findings and recommendations. ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/04/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel and an expert witness 51 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants Sagireddy, Naseer Service of Counts III and V of the first amended complaint be ordered on defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo, as set forth above in Section III. The clerk of the court be ordered to provide to plaintiff a blank summons, a copy of the pleading filed 2/11/15 39, 4 USM-285 forms, and instructions for service of process on defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo. Within 30 days of service of an order adopting these findings and recommendations, plaintiff shall return the Notice of Submission of Documents with the completed summons, the completed USM-285 forms, and 5 copies of the endorsed first amended complaint filed 2/11/15. Defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo will be required to respond to plaintiff's allegations as set forth above within the deadlines state in FRCP 12(a)(1). Failure to comply with the order will result in a recommendation that the claims against defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo be dismissed. Counts Iv and VI through XI and defendants Howell, Abirimahmud, Mofor, Acuvera, Racacho, Casino, Tucker, Beard, Duffy, Does 1-4, Malone, Barton, Eggman, Dickinson, Lau and Erilem be dismissed without leave to amend as set forth above in Section IV. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order 51 be denied. Motion for Preliminary Injunction or temporary restraining order 51 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 2/8/2016 (Plummer, M).
March 25, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER adopting in full 68 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/25/16. Within 30 days of service of this order, defendants Sagireddy, Naseer, and Foronda are ordered to respond to Counts I, II, and III of the first amended complaint as set forth in Section III of the 2/5/2016 findings and recommendations. Service of Counts III and V of the first amended complaint is ordered on defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo, as set forth in Section III of the February 5, 2016 findings and recommendations. The Clerk is ordered to provide to plaintiff a blank summons, a copy of the pleading filed 2/11/2015 39, four USM-285 forms, and instructions for service of process on defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo. Within 30 days of service of this order, plaintiff shall return the Notice of Submission of Documents with the required completed documents. Failure to comply with the order will result in a recommendation that the claims against defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo be dismissed. Counts IV and VI through XI and defendants Howell, Abirimahmud, Mofor, Acuvera, Racacho, Casino, Tucker, Beard, Duffy, Does #1-4, Malone, Barton, Eggman, Dickinson, Lau, and Erilim are dismissed without leave to amend as set forth in Section IV of the 2/5/2016, findings and recommendations. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order 51 is denied. (Kastilahn, A)
May 11, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/11/16 RECOMMENDING that defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
May 23, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/23/16 ORDERING that within 21 days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shallfile and serve an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non- opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the claims against defendant Sagireddy be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).(Dillon, M)
June 20, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER adopting 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 06/17/16 ORDERING that Defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Benson, A)
July 1, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/30/2016 RECOMMENDING the claims against defendant Sagireddy be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
August 17, 2016
PDF | More
o file a motion specifically addressing that order. (Plummer, M) Modified on 8/17/2016 (Plummer, M).ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/16/16 ordering plaintiffs motion for reconsideration 76 is construed as objections to the July 1, 2016 findings and recommendations. The July 1, 2016 findings and recommendations 75 are vacated. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from service of this order to file a response to defendant Sagireddys motion to dismiss. If plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the order dismissing defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo 74, he will need t
March 2, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/02/17 recommending that Defendant Sagireddys motion to dismiss the claims in Count I and III (ECF No. 70) be DENIED. If these findings and recommendations are adopted by the District Judge, defendant Sagireddy be directed to file an answer to Counts I and III of the amended complaint within thirty days of the order adopting these findings and recommendations. Motion to Dismiss 70 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 10 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 3/3/2017 (Plummer, M).
March 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER adopting in full 84 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/17. Defendant Sagireddy's 70 motion to dismiss the claims in Count I and III is DENIED. Defendant Sagireddy is DIRECTED to file an answer to Counts I and III of the amended complaint within 30 days. (Kastilahn, A)
July 17, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/14/17 denying 91 Motion for leave to amend. (Plummer, M)
July 19, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/18/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff's 94 Motion for Reconsideration be construed as a renewed Motion for Extension of Time and DENYING 94 Renewed Motion for Extension of Time without prejudice. (Henshaw, R)
August 28, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/25/2017 DISMISSING this action per 97 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)