Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-454 - (TEMP)(PC) Shahid v. Aldaz, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-454 - (TEMP)(PC) Shahid v. Aldaz, et al.
March 5, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/5/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the courts form for filing a civil rights action.(Dillon, M)
March 5, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/5/14 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Umar Shahid and forward payment to the court until the balance is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)
July 11, 2014
PDF | More
aintiff's 12 motion for preliminary injunctive relief; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff the form for filing a civil rights action.(Yin, K)ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/10/2014 DISMISSING plaintiff's amended complaint; GRANTING plaintiff's 12 motion to amend, and plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint; DENYING, without prejudice, pl
March 17, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying 23 Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/17/15. (Plummer, M)
June 17, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/16/15 granting 29 Motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order. Defendants shall file any dispositive motion on the merits of this case within 90 days of the court ruling on defendants' exhaustion motion. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the court's discovery and scheduling order issued on 12/15/14 remains in effect. (Plummer, M)
November 12, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/10/15 ORDERING that Defendants motion to strike (Doc. No. 32) is denied as unnecessary; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendants Rodriguez and Thompson be granted in part and denied in part as follow:a. Defendants motion for summary judgment based on plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required (Doc. No. 96) be denied with respect to plaintiffs right-to-marry claim against defendant Rodriguez; b. Defendants motion for summary judgment based on plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required (Doc. No. 96) be granted with respect to plaintiffs retaliation claim against defendant Thompson; and Defendant Thompson be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
December 29, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/28/15 adopting 37 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full and granting in part and denying in part Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Thompson is dismissed from this action without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
February 25, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/24/16 ordering plaintiff's 2/16/16 motion for extension of time 42 is granted. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's 6/10/15 motion for summary judgment 30 is denied without prejudice to its renewal with the filing of plaintiff's opposition to defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff shall renew his motion for summary judgment merely by filing with his opposition a notice of motion for summary judgment. Thereafter plaintiff's renewed motion for summary judgment will be submitted for findings and recommendations on all the papers on file following the filing of defendants' reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
April 29, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/28/2016 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 44 motion for summary judgment be denied; defendant's 41 motion for summary judgment be granted; and this action be closed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)