Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1872 - Perrie v. Perrie


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1872 - Perrie v. Perrie
June 19, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/18/15 GRANTING 4 Motion to Dismiss. The Court is not convinced that Plaintiff can cure the deficiencies in the complaint through amendment. However, in the event that Plaintiff can allege facts that would support these claims being excluded from the bankruptcy estate, the Court shall allow Plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint. Should Plaintiff elect to do so, it must be filed with this Court within 21 days from the entry of this order. (Meuleman, A)
March 21, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/18/2016. Court is GRANTING defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's 13 First Amended Complaint. Court has provided plaintiff with previous opportunities to amend and finds she is unable to allege facts that would allow her to bring instant claims. See Gardner v. Marino, 563 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir. 2009) (finding no abuse of discretion in denying leave to amend when amendment would be futile). Therefore, defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. (Marciel, M)
May 6, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/6/16 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 29 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and plaintiff is hereby informed that she may file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). (Jackson, T)