Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-2809 - (PC) Jackson v. Singh et al

Download Files


Document in Context
14-2809 - (PC) Jackson v. Singh et al
April 23, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/23/2015 ORDERING that this action be randomly assigned to a US District Judge; AND RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 2 application to proceed IFP be denied; and this action be dismissed without prejudice to re-filing upon pre-payment of the $400.00 fee. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
July 7, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/6/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 are ADOPTED in PART; Plaintiff's 2 Application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and as plaintiff has now paid the filing fee, this matter is REMANDED back to the magistrate judge for screening of the complaint pursuant to 28:1915A. (Reader, L)
January 27, 2017
PDF | More
endment retaliation claim against defendant Aguileria for forcing plaintiff to withdraw his medical appeals or risk losing single-cell status (id. 71). All other claims and defendants are dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days of service of this order. Plaintiff is not obligated to amend his complaint. Within 30 days of service of this order plaintiff must return the attached Notice Re Amendment. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. (Plummer, M) ModifiORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/26/17 ordering The allegations in the pleading are sufficient at least to state the following potentially cognizable claims: (1) Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Osman, Bick, and Spencer for denying plaintiff proper housing and medical care (ECF No. 1, 51, 53, 57, 59, 125); (2) a first Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Singh for retaining plaintiff in administrative segregation (id. 48, 55, 63); and (3) a first Amed on 1/27/2017 (Plummer, M).
July 28, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/27/2017 GRANTING 18 Request for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 15 days from the date this order is served to effect service of process. (Henshaw, R)