Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-665 - (HC) Marks v. Frauenheim


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-665 - (HC) Marks v. Frauenheim
April 2, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/01/15 denying 1 request to stay in state to exhaust all claims. Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file a petition. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner the court's form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus and the application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
January 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/30/2017 ORDERING petitioner's 21, 24 motions for appointment of counsel are DENIED without prejudice; petitioner's 24 motion for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED without prejudice as premature. (Yin, K)
August 14, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/11/2017 DENYING petitioner's 29 request for the appointment of counsel. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's 28 motion for a stay be denied as moot; petitioner's 29 request for an evidentiary hearing be denied; and petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
July 31, 2018
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/30/18 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability 36 be construed as a rule 59(e) motion and be denied. Motion 36 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
October 24, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/18 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed July 31, 2018, in full; DENYING Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability (ECF No. 36); and DECLINING to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253. (Becknal, R)