Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1123 - (PS) Blackshire v. Sacramento County Sheriff


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1123 - (PS) Blackshire v. Sacramento County Sheriff
May 29, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/29/15 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days. (Manzer, C)
June 18, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/18/2015 ORDERING 4 Plaintiff's request for reparation is construed as a first amended complaint; Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED; and Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of service of this order to file a second amended complaint that complies with the requirements of the FRCP and the Local Rules of Practice. (Reader, L)
July 9, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/8/15 ORDERING that: Plaintiff's second amended complaint is dismissed; and Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a third amended complaint that complies with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice; the third amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled "Third Amended Complaint"; plaintiff must file an original and two copies of the third amended complaint; failure to file a third amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Becknal, R)
July 24, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending action be dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/24/2015. These Findings and Recommendations are SUBMITTED to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
September 21, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER rejecting 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 9/18/15. Plaintiff may proceed on his third amended complaint 8. The Court construes Plaintiff's Objections to the Findings and Recommendations 10 as a motion for the appointment of counsel and hereby GRANTS that motion. This action is referred to the Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution and Pro Bono Program Director Sujean Park to locate an attorney. When Plaintiff's appointed counsel serves Defendant Sacramento County Sheriff, Defendant will be required to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a). (Kastilahn, A)
June 3, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/3/2016 DENYING 15 Plaintiffs request for appointment of counsel.(Reader, L)
July 21, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/21/2016 ORDERING that no later than 8/24/2016, plaintiff shall serve defendant with summons and a copy of the 8 third amended complaint in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and shall file proof of service of said service. Failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Zignago, K.)
August 11, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/11/2016 DENYING 21 Request for Settlement Conference without prejudice. (Michel, G.)
August 29, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/29/16 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
March 14, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/14/2018; On 3/8/2018, plaintiff filed a one-page document styled as a "Request for Reconsideration." This action was closed on 11/14/2016. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff after the closing date will be disregarded, and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Zignago, K.)