Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-2055 - (PC) Houston v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Facility, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-2055 - (PC) Houston v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Facility, et al.
October 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/16/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to amend. (Dillon, M)
October 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/16/15 ORDERING that Sheriff of Solano County to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Jon Lloyd Houston to the clerk until the balance of $350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Solano County. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
January 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/21/16. (Kaminski, H)
September 23, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/23/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 34) is DENIED; Plaintiff's motion to accept defendants' failure to respond to his request for admissions (ECF No. 36) is DENIED; Plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint (ECF No. 39) is deemed RESOLVED. (Dillon, M)
December 29, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/29/16 ordering plaintiff's second amended complaint 45 is stricken. Plaintiff's motion to continued discovery 44 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to compel 47 is denied. Within 7 days of the date of this order, defendant shall file a short pleading clarifying the effective date of the policy it provided plaintiff in response to his request for production of documents (as well as the date of the policy provided by internal affairs if defendant can ascertain it). Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion is due within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
July 12, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/11/2017 DENYING 58 Motion to Reopen Discovery and RECOMMENDING that 59 Motion to Amend be granted with respect to the claims against defendant Sacramento County consistent with those addressed in the pending 52 Motion for Summary Judgment and denied in all other respects and 52 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due with 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
December 20, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/19/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed July 12, 2017, are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's motion to amend (ECF No. 59) is GRANTED with respect to the claims against defendant Sacramento County that are consistent with those addressed in the pending summary judgment motion; plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED in all other respects; and Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 52) is GRANTED. (Becknal, R)