Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-603 - Huskins et al. v. City of Vallejo et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-603 - Huskins et al. v. City of Vallejo et al.
October 27, 2016
PDF | More
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/27/2016. (Zignago, K.)
January 20, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 22 Motion for leave to notice two separate depositions signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/20/17. (Kaminski, H)
April 11, 2017
PDF | More
tent possible, plaintiffs shall also designate which documents are responsive to requests concerning plaintiffs' damages. Defendants' request to compel unredacted copies of documents is DENIED without prejudice due to the parties' faORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/11/2017 ORDERING that within 14 days, plaintiff shall designate which documents are responsive to each set of request for production of documents served on plaintiffs. To the exilure to sufficiently meet and confer regarding this issue. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Zignago, K.)
July 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/30/2017 GRANTING 8 Motion to Dismiss as to Huskins's First Cause of Action against Defendant Park; DENYING 8 Motion to Dismiss as to Quinn's First Cause of Action against Defendant Park; DENYING 8 Motion to Dismiss as to the plaintiffs' Second, Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action; GRANTING 8 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Park from Quinn's Fourth Cause of Action; DENYING 9 Motion to Strike; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Status Report within thirty (30) days. (Michel, G.)
August 31, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/29/17: All proceedings, deadlines, and discovery in this case shall be stayed pending the outcome of defendants' appeal of the order denying the anti-SLAPP motion. All responses to currently pending discovery shall be due within two weeks of the Ninth Circuit's issuance of the mandate following the appeal, or at another time as agreed upon by the parties. (Kaminski, H)