Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1093 - Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1093 - Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
July 25, 2017
PDF | More
ent Department, Board of Supervisors, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Sheriffs Department, Department of Revenue Recovery, and all claims against the individual County employees in their official capacity, as duplicative to the County defendant; AORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/24/2017 GRANTING 16 7 Motions to Dismiss and decides the following: DISMISSES all claims against the County Planning Department, Building Code Department, County Counsel, Community DevelopmBSTAINS from hearing plaintiffs' first, second, third and fourth claims until plaintiffs' related state court cases resolve; DISMISSES plaintiffs' fifth, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh claims, without prejudice; DISMISSES plaintiffs' sixth claim, with prejudice; and GRANTS plaintiffs' request to amend the complaint within fourteen days of this order. (Washington, S)
September 11, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/11/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is now due no later than 9/8/17; Defendants have until 9/22/17, to respond to the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted by the FRCP. Plaintiffs' and the County Defendants' initial disclosures shall be served within fourteen days after the County Defendants file an answer to the complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 21, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/21/2017 ORDERING the defendants to respond to the 35 Second Amended Complaint by 10/13/2017. (Michel, G.)
October 11, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/11/17: Counts Three through Seven of the Second Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
October 11, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/11/17: Defendants Manuel Mejia, Ben Green and Robert Logsdon are dismissed without prejudice. Count Nine of the Second Amended Complaint (Bane Act) is dismissed without prejudice. Count Twelve of the Second Amended Complaint (First Amendment Right of Access to the Court) is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
January 24, 2018
PDF | More
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/23/2018 ORDERING: Discovery due by 6/6/2018; Expert Disclosures due by 8/13/2018; Supplemental Expert Disclosures due by 9/3/2018; Completion of Expert Discovery due by 10/5/2018; Dispositive Motions heard no later than 11/2/2018; File Joint Pretrial Conference Statement VACATED; Final Pretrial Conference VACATED; Trial Briefs Due VACATED; and Jury Trial VACATED. (Hunt, G)
February 13, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/12/2018 ORDERING that: this court DISMISSES plaintiffs tort claims against all County defendants,without leave to amend, and DISMISSES plaintiffs retaliation claim as pled against County defendants Lee and Evans, without leave to amend. The court DISMISSES plaintiffs equal protection claim against SMUD, with leave to amend, and DISMISSES plaintiffs unreasonable seizure claim against SMUD, without leave to amend and DENIES 44 and 47 Motions to Dismiss. As a result, only two claims remains: A due process claim against SMUD and aretaliation claim against all remaining County defendants except for Lee and Evans. Should plaintiffs elect to amend their equal protection claim against SMUD, they must do so within 14 days. (Hunt, G)