Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1611 - (SS) Gummeson v. Commissioner of Social Security


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1611 - (SS) Gummeson v. Commissioner of Social Security
July 18, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/18/2016 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to issue process. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. (Jackson, T)
February 15, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/15/17 ORDERING that the date for defendant to respond to plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 03/03/17; the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. (Benson, A)
March 9, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/9/17 ORDERING that the date for defendant to respond to plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 04/07/17. (Kaminski, H)
April 27, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's reply brief is DUE on 5/5/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
September 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/15/2017 GRANTING 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security; REMANDING this matter for further proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
December 15, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER for the award of Attorney fees signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/15/17. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of SIX THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED TEN DOLLARS ($6,710.00) in EAJA Attorney fees shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and Plaintiffs attorney, Jonathan O. Pea, Esq, may have relating to EAJA Attorney fees in connection with this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)