Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2292 - Howard v. DJI Technology, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2292 - Howard v. DJI Technology, Inc.
November 28, 2016
PDF | More
s 12/14/2016. The deadline for DJI's optional reply in support of the Motion is 12/21/2016. (Zignago, K.)MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 11/28/2016 ORDERING that this Court elects to decide the 9 Motion to Dismiss without a hearing, pursuant to L.R. 230 (g). The deadline for any party to file an opposition to the Motion i
December 22, 2016
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER issued by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 12/22/2016 DENYING 9 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to the filing of a new Motion to Dismiss addressing the 11 First Amended Complaint. (Michel, G.)
January 18, 2017
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 1/17/17 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is MOVED to 2/22/2017 at 05:00 PM. (Eastern District of California time which is 3:00 PM (Hawaii time) before Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi. Joint Status Report is due 15 days before the Status Conference.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 9/20/17. (Kaminski, H)
September 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 9/21/17, ORDERING that a Case Management Status Conference is SET for 12/11/2017 at 11:30 AM (Hawaii Time) before District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi. (Approximately 02:30 PM Eastern District of CA time). All Counsel from the Eastern District of California to participate by telephone. (Kastilahn, A)
December 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 12/4/2017 ORDERING this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiff's individual claims and without prejudice as to the putative Class. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S)