Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2584 - (PS) Cuviello v. City of Vallejo et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2584 - (PS) Cuviello v. City of Vallejo et al
March 10, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/10/2017 ORDERING No pretrial scheduling order will issue at this time. Within 60 days from the date of this order, defendants shall file their proposed motion addressing their allegation that some or all of this action is precluded by the judgment in the California state court action. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' motion within 30 days of defendants' filing that motion. Defendants shall file a reply, if any, 14 days thereafter. The court will issue a pretrial scheduling order, if necessary, on the court's own motion at a later time after the court has sought further input from the parties regarding the scheduling of this matter subsequent to the resolution of defendants' proposed motion.(Washington, S)
April 28, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/28/17 RECOMMENDING that the 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction be denied; referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Benson, A)
May 16, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/16/2017 ORDERING 30 that the stipulated request to allow plaintiff to utilize the court's electronic filing system is DENIED. (Reader, L)
June 29, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/29/17 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 25 motion for partial summary judgment be GRANTED, Plaintiff's fifth claim also be DISMISSED, Judgment be entered in favor of defendant, and the Clerk be directed to close this case and vacate any remaining dates. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kastilahn, A)
September 1, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/31/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 are ADOPTED. Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 18 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 3, 2018
PDF | More
status conference, as well as any other information necessary to facilitate the scheduling of this matter. Case STAYED. (York, M)ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/2018 STAYING Case pending the outcome of plaintiff's interlocutory appeal of the court's order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction, Case No. 17-16948. The parties shall file an updated joint status report in this court, within 14 days of the date the 9th Court of Appeals issues its mandate in Case No. 17-16948. The status report shall provide the information outlined in the court's prior 3 order setting