Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2673 - (CONSENT)(PS) Vail v. City of Sacramento


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2673 - (CONSENT)(PS) Vail v. City of Sacramento
February 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/27/17 ORDERING that a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 4/7/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before 3/24/2017, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before 3/31/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
April 4, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/3/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff Show Cause in writing within fourteen days as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; the 4/7/17 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is CONTINUED to Friday, 5/26/17, at 10:00 a.m., at the US District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned; On or before 5/12/17, plaintiff shall file a Status Report in compliance with the 2/27/17 order; and Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Becknal, R)
May 25, 2017
PDF | More
CONSENT ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/22/2017 REASSIGNING CASE for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, to Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes; VACATING all dates and hearings set before Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that all documents filed hereafter bear case number: 2:16-cv-02673 DB (PS). (Michel, G.)
May 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/26/17 ORDERING defendant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within 14 days as to why defendant should not be sanctioned for failing to appear at the 05/26/17 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. The (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is CONTINUED to 7/7/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. (Benson, A)
June 23, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/22/17. ORDERING that the July 7, 2017 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is VACATED.(Becknal, R)
July 25, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/24/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; CONTINUING 16 Motion to Dismiss to 8/25/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes; On or before 8/11/2017, plaintiff shall file a statement of opposition or non-opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss; and Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Washington, S) Modified on 7/26/2017 (Washington, S).
February 6, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/5/18 GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss: Plaintiff's November 10, 2016 complaint 1 is dismissed with leave to amend. Within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, an amended complaint shall be filed that cures the defects noted in this order. (Kaminski, H)
May 11, 2018
PDF | More
[DISCHARGED AS PER 32 ORDER] signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/10/2018 ORDERING that plaintiff show cause in writing within 14 days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed. (Hunt, G)
May 31, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/31/2018 DISCHARGING 29 Order to Show Cause and DIRECTING Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. (York, M)
October 15, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/15/18 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order, the court will issue plaintiff an order to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed due to plaintiff's lack of prosecution-unless defendant has filed a responsive pleading. If defendant has filed a responsive pleading, the court will forgo such an order, and plaintiff should respond to defendant's pleading accordingly. (Kastilahn, A)