Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

99-627 - (HC)(DP) Arias v. Calderon, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
99-627 - (HC)(DP) Arias v. Calderon, et al
January 5, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/05/09 ordering petitioner's request 156 is granted. The time for filing petitioner's 2nd amended petition is extended through and including 01/16/09. (Plummer, M)
January 16, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/16/2009 GRANTING 159 Request; The time for filing Petitioner's Second Amended Petition is extended through and including 1/20/2009. (Matson, R)
February 11, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/11/09 ORDERING the Status Conference RESET for 5/15/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Donati, J)
May 14, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/14/09 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED until 8/14/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.(Yin, K)
August 13, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/09: Status Conference continued to 10/23/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.(Kaminski, H)
October 29, 2009
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/09 175 ORDERING that the Status Conference, currently set for October 30, 2009 is CONTINUED to 1/8/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Duong, D)
January 7, 2010
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/7/10 Granting 179 Stipulation. Status Conference CONTINUED for 7/16/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Petitioner's reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading is extended until August 6, 2010. (Buzo, P)
July 15, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/15/10 ORDERING the status conference currently set for 7/16/10, is continued until Friday, 9/17/10, at 10:00 a.m. The time for petitioner to file a reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading is extended until Friday, 10/8/10. (Becknal, R)
September 16, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/16/10 ORDERING that the Status Conference is continued to 10/29/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Time for petitioner to file a reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading is extended until 11/19/10. (Owen, K)
October 29, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/10 ORDERING that the status conference currently set for October 29, 2010, is continued until 12/10/10, at 10:00 a.m. The time for petitioner to file a reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading is extended until 12/31/10. (Dillon, M)
February 23, 2011
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/23/11 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 04/22/11 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. If U.S. Supreme Court case "Walker" is decided before 04/22/11, petitioner will file a reply or traverse w/i 60 days after the status conference. If "Walker" is decided after the status conference, but before the end of the 2010-2011 term, the traverse will be filed w/i 60 days after the decision is issued. If "Walker" is not decided by 06/30/11, petitioner will file the reply or traverse no later than 08/29/11. (Benson, A.)
April 18, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/11 ORDERING that within 20 days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a brief onthe impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, No. 09-1088, 2011 WL 1225705 (U.S. Apr. 4, 2011) on these proceedings. Within 20 days after petitioner files his brief, respondent shall file a responsive brief. Within 10 days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.(Dillon, M)
April 21, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/20/11 ORDERING that by 6/21/11, petitioner will file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading. Status Conference is CONTINUED to 7/1/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.(Dillon, M)
June 7, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/6/2011 ORDERING that by 8/29/11, ptnr to file a reply addressing the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster on these proceedings; w/in another 30 days, respondent to submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster on these proceedings and ptnr may submit any reply w/in 14 days thereafter; the 7/1/2011 Status Conference is CONTINUED to 10/28/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd; the dates set in the 4/18/11 order are VACATED. (Yin, K)
August 22, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/19/11 GRANTING 210 Motion to modify the briefing schedule. By 9/12/11, petitioner will file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading. Within another 30 days, respondent will submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Pinholster here and petitioner may submit any reply within 14 days thereafter. The status conference set for 11/10/11, at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled. (Dillon, M)
September 13, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/12/11 GRANTING 212 Request filed by Pedro Arias; By September 15, 2011, petitioner will file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading. (Matson, R)
September 16, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/15/11 ordering by 09/19/11, petitioner shall file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster her. Within another 30 days, respondent will submit a responsive pleading addressing the impace of Pinholster here and petitioner may submit any reply within 14 days thereafter. The status conference set for 11/10/11 at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled. (Plummer, M)
September 20, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/20/11 ORDERING that by 9/22/11, petitioner shall file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster here. Within another 30 days, respondent shall submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Pinholster here and petitioner may submit any reply within ten days thereafter. The status conference set for 11/10/11, at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled. (Kastilahn, A)
September 23, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/22/11 ORDERING that by 9/26/11, petitioner will file the reply or traverse or other appropriate pleading, which will also address the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S., 131 S.Ct. 1388, 179 L.Ed.2d 557 (2011) on these proceedings. Within 30 days after petitioners filing, respondent will submit a responsive pleading addressing the impact of Pinholster here and petitioner may submit any reply within 7 days thereafter. The status conference set for 11/10/11, at 10:00 a.m. remains as scheduled.(Dillon, M)
November 14, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/10/11 ORDERING that before 12/8/11, the parties shall meet and confer regarding: (a) anyexhaustion defenses and, if necessary, dates for resolving any exhaustion issues; and (b) dates for the filing of memoranda of points and authorities regarding 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) described above. By the close of business on December 8, the parties shall submit a joint statement proposing a schedule and/or describing their disagreements regarding future scheduling in this action. On 12/13/11 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom #27, the undersigned will hold a scheduling conference. The parties may appear by telephone. If they wish to do so, they shall contact Courtroom Deputy Pete Buzo at least 48 hours prior to the conference at (916) 930- 4128. (Dillon, M)
December 12, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/9/2011 ORDERING that petitioner's memorandum of points and authorities re the second amended petition is due by 8/10/2012, respondent's opposition is due by 4/12/2013, petitioner's reply is due by 8/12/2013; a Status Conference is set for 3/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd, prior to the conference, the parties shall meet and confer re exhaustion, a joint statement is due on 3/8/2012; and the 12/13/11 scheduling conference is taken off calendar. (Yin, K)
March 9, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/8/12 241 Motion to modify the briefing schedule. The status conference currently scheduled for March 16, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., is continued to Thursday, May 3, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. On or before Thursday, April 26, 2012, the parties shall file a joint statement describing which, if any, claims Respondent contends are unexhausted and Petitioners position with respect to each of those claims. If the parties are not in agreement regarding exhaustion, they shall also propose a plan for resolving the exhaustion issues.(Dillon, M)
April 27, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/26/2012 ORDERING that the 5/3/2012 Status Conference is CONTINUED to 6/21/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd; on or before 6/14/2012, the parties shall file a joint statement.(Yin, K)
June 19, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/18/12 ordering respondent has waived the exhaustion defense with respect to claim 29. In the joint statement, petitioner requests an extension of the 08/10/12 deadline for the filing of his points and authorities regarding the application of 28 USC 2254(d) to each claim in the Second Amended Petition. Respondent has no objection to the requested extension of time. Petitioner has provided good cause for an extension of time, but has not suggested a proposed new due date for his brief. As soon as possible but in any event prior to 08/10/12, petitioner shall propose a new filing date for his section 2254 (d) brief. The 06/21/12 status conference is vacated. (Plummer, M) Modified on 6/20/2012 (Plummer, M).
August 9, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/08/12 ordering petitioner's opening points and authorities regarding the application of 28 USC 2254 (d) to each claim in the second amended petition shall be filed by 01/18/13. Respondents opposition shall be filed by 09/19/13 and petitioner's reply is due 01/19/14.(Plummer, M)
January 17, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/16/13 granting 252 Motion to modify briefing schedule. Petitioner is granted an initial 3 month extension of time for filing his brief regarding 28 USC 2254(d), through 04/18/13 with an ultimate filing date of 07/17/13. On or before 04/18/13, petitioner will submit a detailed progress report, together with any request for extension of time through 07/17/13. The corresponding due dates for respondent's opposition would be 04/23/14, and for petitioner's reply would be on 08/21/14. (Plummer, M)
January 17, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/16/13 ordering that the request to seal documents and confidential declaration of petitioner's counsel, totaling 5 pages in length, submitted ex parte by petitioner on 1/15/13 with this proposed order, in support of petitioner's request to modify briefing schedule, shall be filed under seal by the Clerk and remain sealed except as to petitioner's counsel, Peter Giannini and Tim Brosnan, pending further order of the court. (Plummer, M)
October 16, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/15/13 ORDERING that 263 Motion to Continue is GRANTED; petitioner is granted a six month extension of time for filing his brief regarding 28 U.S.C. §2254(d), through April 15, 2014. Respondents opposition will be due on or before January 15, 2015, and petitioners reply on or before May 15, 2015.(Dillon, M)
February 5, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/04/14 ordering that Peter Giannini be relieved as petitioner's counsel and that Tim Brosnan be affirmed as lead counsel. (Plummer, M) Modified on 2/6/2014 (Plummer, M).
March 19, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/18/2014 GRANTING petitioner's 267 request and the Selection Board shall recommend second counsel to represent petitioner; and within 5 days, respondent shall file an opposition to petitioner's 267 motion for an extension of time to file opening brief. (Yin, K)
March 27, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/26/14 ordering within 10 days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall propose a due date for fling his section 2254(d) brief. In keeping with past practice the court expects petitioner's counsel to seek a stipulation from respondent's counsel with respect to the proposed extension of time. (Plummer, M)
September 16, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/15/14 ORDERING that the due date for submission of petitioner's brief regarding application of 28 U.S.C. ' 2254(d) to all claims is deferred through and including October 15, 2014.(Dillon, M)
December 16, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/15/14 granting 279 Motion for Extension of time. The due date for submission of petitioner's brief regarding application of 28 U.S.C. ' 2254(d) to all claims is deferred through and including January 14, 2015.(Dillon, M)
January 14, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/13/15 ORDERING that the due date for submission of petitioner's brief regarding application of 28 U.S.C. ' 2254(d) to all claims is deferred through and including February 13, 2015.(Dillon, M)
March 17, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/16/15 ORDERING that petitioners March 13, 2015 motion (ECF No. 286) is GRANTED. The due date for submission of petitioner's brief regarding application of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to all claims is deferred through and including April 15, 2015.(Dillon, M)
April 20, 2015
PDF | More
ED through and including 5/31/2016.(Yin, K)ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/17/2015 and stipulated between the parties to CONTINUE the due date for petitioner's opening brief re application 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims in the petition; the due date is DEFERR
June 16, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/15/2017 GRANTING 329 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner's brief regarding the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims due by and including 9/11/2017. (Henshaw, R)
March 23, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/22/2018 GRANTING 342 Motion for Extension of Time. The time in which to file petitioner's brief regarding application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims is extended through and including 5/29/2018.(Henshaw, R)
May 30, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/30/2018 GRANTING 344 Motion for Extension of Time. The time in which to file petitioner's brief regarding application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is extended through and including 7/31/2018. (Henshaw, R)
July 31, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/31/2018 GRANTING 346 Motion for Extension of Time. The time in which to file petitioner's brief regarding application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims is extended through and including 10/1/2018. (Henshaw, R)