Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-4189 - Bui v. City and County of San Francisco et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-4189 - Bui v. City and County of San Francisco et al
May 18, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 27 Stipulation to continue settlement conference. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
May 21, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER granting 28 STIPULATIONTo Modify Case Management and Pretrial Order filed by City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/21/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)
February 13, 2013
PDF | More
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/11/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)
October 3, 2013
PDF | More
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/3/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2013)
November 8, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER REGARDING 57 THE PARTIES' DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTERS FILED OCTOBER 23, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/8/2013.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013)
December 12, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' LETTER DATED DECEMBER 11, 2013 (Re: ECF No. 68). Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/12/2013. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2013)
February 10, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER SETTING DATES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/10/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2014)
March 28, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO SUBMIT REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESS AFTER THE DEADLINE. Under the circumstances, and given the time line, the court directs the parties to try and work it out (and they should) as soon as possible, and if they cannot, Defendants must file a two-page letter brief by Monday, March 31, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiffs may file an optional one-page reply by Tuesday, April 1, 2014. The court thereafter will decide if further briefing is needed. If the parties work it out, they should notify the court by March 31, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/28/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2014)
April 24, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 101 PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. So that the docket is clear and to enable easy citation, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to do the following: 1. File as a separate docket entry the redacted opposition brief (e.g., ECF No. 109) 2. File as separate docket entry and under seal the unredacted opposition brief with the sealable portions highlighted (e.g., ECF No. 110) 3. File as a separate docket entry the Schwartz Declaration with all of its exhibits (Exs. A - DD), with Exhibit BB filed under seal (e.g., ECF No. 111) 4. File as a separate docket entry the redacted Clark Declaration (e.g., ECF No. 112) 5. File as a separate docket entry and under seal the unredacted Clark Declaration with the sealable portions highlighted (e.g., ECF No. 113) 6. Provide the court with chambers copies of each of the above-listed documents. Plaintiffs do not need to re-file the Herrmann Declaration (ECF No. 103) or the Tran Declaration (ECF No. 104). Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/24/2014.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2014)
June 27, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 81 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 6/27/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014)
July 18, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. To keep the case moving along, and pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(d), the court directs Plaintiffs to file a response to Defendants' motion by 5:00 p.m. PDT on Wednesday, July 23, 2014, so the court can discuss it with the parties at the case management conference set for Thursday, July 24, 2014. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/18/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)
July 25, 2014
PDF | More
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AT ECF NO. 81 (This order amends the order at ECF No. 137.) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 7/25/2014)
October 9, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER DENYING 159 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO VACATE THE STAY PENDING APPEAL. The court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion. In light of Defendants' appeal, the court vacates all remaining dates and deadlines currently set by this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/9/2014.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2014)
January 31, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting in part 187 Administrative Motion to Modify the Court's Case Management Order to Allow Defendants to Supplement Expert Witness Based on Unavailability of Witness; denying 192 Administrative Motion to Strike Portion of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Administrative Motion to Supplement Expert Witness.As set forth in the attached order, the defendants' administrative motion to substitute their expert witness is granted in part. The defendants may substitute their expert provided that their new expert does not provide opinions that are different from or in addition to those that were offered by their original expert. The defendants' motion to strike is denied. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018)
February 27, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler. The court adopts the attached Final Pretrial Order. The attached order disposes of the parties' motions in limine. The disposition of those motions in the attached order controls over the summary of the holdings in this docket entry. The attached order grants the plaintiffs' motion in limine #1, 200 ; grants the plaintiffs' motion in limine #2, 200 ; grants in part and denies in part the plaintiffs' motion in limine #3, 194 ; grants in part and denies in part the plaintiffs' motion in limine #4, 195 ; grants the plaintiffs' motion in limine #5 200 ; defers ruling on the plaintiffs' motion in limine #6 196 ; grants in part and denies in part the plaintiffs' motion in limine #7 197 ; denies the defendants' motion in limine #1 208 ; grants in part and denies in part the defendants' motion in limine #2 209 ; grants in part and denies in part the defendants' motion in limine #3 210 ; grants in part and denies in part the defendants' motion in limine #4 211 ; grants in part the defendants' motion in limine #5 212 ; grants in part and denies in part the defendants' motion in limine #6 213 ; denies the defendants' motion in limine #7 214 ; grants in part and denies in part the defendants' motion in limine #8 243 ; and finds as moot the defendants' motion in limine #9 244. The plaintiffs' motion, 199, to exceed seven pages for motion in limine #1 is granted. The plaintiffs' motion, 246, to strike the defendants' amended response to the plaintiffs motion in limine #7 and to strike the defendants' motions in limine #8 and #9 is denied as moot. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018)