Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-561 - Synopsys, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-561 - Synopsys, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. et al
June 20, 2017
PDF | More
CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/20/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)
August 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS by Judge William H. Orrick granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Dismiss; denying 35 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 54 Motion to Strike. If Synopsys wishes to file a further Amended Complaint, it must do so within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2017)
October 10, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline to file reply to 77 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims. Reply due by 10/13/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/10/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017)
November 8, 2017
PDF | More
SEE DOCKET NUMBER 92 FOR THE CORRECT ATTACHMENT ORDER granting 90 STIPULATION to continue hearing as to 79 MOTION to Dismiss, 80 MOTION to Strike, and 77 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims. Motion Hearing reset for 11/29/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/8/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2017) Modified on 11/14/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).
January 29, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler adjudicating 109 Discovery Letter Brief.As set forth in the attached order, the court holds that Ubiquiti's Taiwanese computers are not per se outside the scope of relevant discovery merely because they are located outside the United States.As the court previously advised the parties, discovery, including any forensic inspections of the computers, must comply with the standard discovery factors, including proportionality, burden, and the defendants' legitimate interests in maintaining the integrity of their systems and the confidentiality of their data. If the parties have not yet reached an agreement, they must meet and confer regarding an appropriate inspection protocol. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2018)
March 13, 2018
PDF | More
the date below. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2018)ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS by Judge William H. Orrick denying 77 Motion for Leave to File, granting 79 Motion to Dismiss, and denying 80 Motion to Strike. Defendants' further motions to amend, if any, should be filed within twenty days of
May 14, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler adjudicating 190 Discovery Letter Brief. As set forth in the attached order, the court orders that (subject to the terms of the Protective Order) Ubiquiti's expert Dr. Vojin Oklobdzija can view the call-home data, SNPS00000001, but not the other Synopsys user manuals/technical documents at issue in the discovery letter brief. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2018)
May 21, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler adjudicating 198 Discovery Letter Brief.As set forth in the attached order, the court declines to order Synopsys to produce printouts of the source code in question. This denial is without prejudice to a future request for source-code printouts, upon a proper showing that such printouts "are reasonably necessary for the preparation of court filings, pleadings, expert reports, or other papers, or for deposition or trial."The court also reminds the parties that discovery letter briefs must be filed under the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings > Motions General > Discovery Letter Brief," not as "Letters," on ECF. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on May 21, 2018. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2018)