Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

18-1002 - Parineh v. Martel

Download Files


Document in Context
18-1002 - Parineh v. Martel
June 4, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, the 1 petition and all attachments thereto, on respondent and respondent's counsel, the Attorney General for the State of California. The Clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on petitioner. On or before August 14,2018, respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner's cognizable claims. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 8/14/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/04/2018. (Attachments: # (1) Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2018) Modified on 6/5/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).