Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

1:13-cv-00176 - Elkay Manufacturing Company v. United States

Download Files


Document in Context
1:13-cv-00176 - Elkay Manufacturing Company v. United States
December 22, 2014
PDF | More
Order entered on 12/22/2014, Slip Op. 14-150, ORDERED that the Final Determination be, and hereby is, set aside as unlawful and remanded for reconsideration and redetermination in accordance with this Opinion and Order. ORDERED that Commerce shall issue, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Opinion and Order, a new determination upon remand ("Remand Redetermination") that conforms to this Opinion and Order and reconsiders the use of surrogate information from Thailand to value cold-rolled stainless steel coil when determining the normal value of Dongyuan's subject merchandise. ORDERED that if Commerce places additional surrogate value data on the record on remand, Commerce must provide parties to this litigation the opportunity to submit comments concerning those data and the Departments decision addressing the valuation of cold-rolled stainless steel coil. ORDERED that in the Remand Redetermination, Commerce shall reconsider its method of accounting for selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") labor costs in its calculation ofnormal value and, as necessary, revise the antidumping duty margins for both the investigated and separate rate respondents. ORDERED that Elkay Manufacturing Company and Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. each may file comments on the Remand Redetermination within thirty (30) days from the date on which the Remand Redetermination is filed with thecourt. ORDERED that defendant may file a response within fifteen (15) days from the date on which the last of any such comments is filed with the court. (related document(s)26, 27) (Taronji, Steve) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/22/2014: # (1) Web Pages Cited in the Opinion (Page 4), # (2) Page 7, # (3) Page 8, # (4) Page 23) (Taronji, Steve).
July 14, 2016
PDF | More
Order entered on 7/14/2016, Slip opinion: 16-69. The court affirms the decision on remand entitled Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Apr. 22, 2015), ECF No. 64. The court will enter judgment accordingly. (related document(s)64) (Attachments: # (1) Cited Web Page 1, # (2) Cited Web Page 2).(Love, Cynthia)