Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

1:17-cv-00125 - Milecrest Corporation, v. United States et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
1:17-cv-00125 - Milecrest Corporation, v. United States et al
July 21, 2017
PDF | More
Public Version of Slip Op. 17-88 entered on 7/21/2017. (related document(s)68).(Love, Cynthia)
September 12, 2017
PDF | More
Order entered on 9/12/2017, Slip Op. 17-124, ORDERED that the information Plaintiff has designated as confidential to protect the identities of Plaintiff and its corporate officers shall no longer be designated as confidential information in all future filings in this action. ORDERED that, on or before September 13, 2017, 5:00 p.m. EDT, Plaintiff shall refile its public summons and amended complaint without redactions of Plaintiff's identity and its corporate officers. ORDERED that the Government and Duracell shall not submit any public filings with the court that reveal the identities of Plaintiff and its corporate officers prior to the refiling of Plaintiff's public summons and amended complaint. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Order Directing Defendant-Intervenor to Show Cause Why Confidential Information Should Not Be Redacted, or to Redact Confidential Information is denied as moot. (related document(s)103, 104) (Taronji, Steve)
September 15, 2017
PDF | More
Order entered on 9/15/2017, Slip opinion: 17-125. ORDERED that Duracell's motion is denied; and it is further ORDERED that this action shall proceed according to the Scheduling Order issued on August 3, 2017, ECF No. 90. (related document(s)93, 92).(Love, Cynthia)