Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-624 - Grady v. Iacullo


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-624 - Grady v. Iacullo
March 20, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 6/7/2013 09:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/20/2013. (kmtcd)
May 2, 2013
PDF | More
ort in this case within ten days of any relief from stay in the bankruptcy case. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 05/02/13. (alvsl, )ORDER: All proceedings in this matter are STAYED unless and until relief from the automatic stay in Bankruptcy Case No. 13-51001-cag is granted. The Scheduling Conference set for June 7, 2013 is VACATED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a status rep
October 18, 2013
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER granting 16 Motion to Reopen Case. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint no later than November 15, 2013. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this Minute Order on Defendant and shall file a Certificate of Service with the court no later than October 23, 2013. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/18/2013.(trlee, )
June 9, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 7/10/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/9/14. (sgrim)
February 4, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER REJECTS 35 the Report and Recommendations; but DENIES 27 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/4/2015.(evana, )
April 8, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying 41 Motion to Stay or Abate Civil Proceedings, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/8/2015.(tscha, )
February 29, 2016
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; It is RECOMMENDED that 52 Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court should grant Plaintiffs request forsummary judgment on his direct copyright infringement claim against Defendant, but should deny the motion in all other respects, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/29/16. (morti, )
April 15, 2016
PDF | More
VACATED ORDER denying 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 54 Report and Recommendations; DENIES defendants Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46 at 7-10); and SUSTAINS 55 defendants objection to the R&R. Ordered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 04/15/2016.(cthom, ) Modified to show VACATED pursuant to 62 on 4/18/2016 (cthom, ).
April 18, 2016
PDF | More
ue to his failure to present evidence to support his claims (id. at 14); and (2) the deletion of language that plaintiff's case would be dismissed if he failed to file a motion for summary judgment after the conclusion of the re-opened discoveryAmended ORDER re 61; OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby VACATES its 61 Opinion entered April 15, 2016 and enters this Opinion in its place. The only changes are: (1) the deletion of language that plaintiff's case could have been dismissed d period (id. at 17). ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 04/18/2016. (cthom, )
March 29, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 71 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/29/2017. (rmlc2)