Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-2218 - Brown v. Zupan et al

Download Files


Document in Context
14-2218 - Brown v. Zupan et al
August 8, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER Directing Applicant To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/08/14. (nmarb, )
December 4, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER To Respondents To File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/4/14. (nmarb, )
February 21, 2015
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 02/21/15 denying 26 Motion for Sanction and Granting of Application. Respondents are directed to resend to Applicant, by February 27, 2015, the Pre-Answer Response, including all exhibits, that was filed with Court on February 3, 2015.(nmarb, )
July 24, 2015
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER Applicants Fifth Motion Requesting an Extension of Time, ECF No. 38, filed July 24, 2015, is GRANTED. His Motion to Strike, ECF No. 38, is DENIED. Applicant shall have thirty days from the date Respondents enter a notification with the Court that they have sent to Applicant, and Applicant has received, the Pre-Answer Response, ECF No. 25, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/24/2015.(evana, )
December 3, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER for state court records by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/3/15. The Clerk is directed to send this order to the Adams County District Court and the State Court Administrator's Office (mailed as ordered). (dkals, )
April 21, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER DRAWING CASE by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/21/16. (dkals, )
March 20, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. IT IS ORDERED that Applicant Toney L. Brown's Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("Application") 1 is DENIED and the civil action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear his own costs and attorney's fees. It is FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant Toney L. Brown has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24., by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/20/2017. (dhans, )