Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-3420 - Echon et al v. Sackett et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-3420 - Echon et al v. Sackett et al
January 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/16/15. Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. (bsimm, )
April 28, 2015
PDF | More
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: 3-Day Jury Trial set for 4/25/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Combined Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set for 4/8/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/28/2015. (alowe)
September 4, 2015
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/4/15. I respectfully RECOMMEND that the Motion to Vacate 26 be converted to a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and DENIED. (bsimm, )
October 1, 2015
PDF | More
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 10/1/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. A proposed protective order is due on or before October 15, 2015. Until the entry of a Protective Order, any documents produced by Defendants shall be designated as attorneys' eyes only. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery 32 is GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents on or before 10/22/2015. If Defendants object to the questions, they must still answer them, but may also note objections. All parties shall comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding discovery, including the verification of interrogatories. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, )
November 3, 2015
PDF | More
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/3/15. (bsimm, )
January 27, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 01/27/16 granting in part and denying in part 60 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Discovery. Consistent with the direction of this Order, Defendants must serve discovery responses to Interrogatories 1 (as limited) - 5, 7-16, and supplemental responses, including production of responsive documents, to Requests for Production No. 2-4, 6, 8, 10, and 11 on Plaintiffs no later than February 9, 2016; and no further extensions to the deadline for Defendants to respond to these discovery requests will be permitted.(nmarb, )
March 14, 2016
PDF | More
Order. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 48 is ACCEPTED. It is further ORDERED that defendants William Sackett and Leonida Sackett's Motion to Vacate the Case 26 is construed as a motion for judgment on the pleadings and is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/14/16.(jhawk, )
May 2, 2016
PDF | More
butable to the deficient interrogatory responses, to be determined by a forthcoming motion for reasonable expenses to be filed by Plaintiffs no later than May 16, 2016; The Motion is DENIED as to the Requests for Production. (Attachments: # (1) ExORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/2/16. Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Compel Discovery 64 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; The Motion is GRANTED as to the Interrogatory Responses and Defendants are COMPELLED to respond to the outstanding interrogatories fully, in narrative form, no later than May 16, 2016 and Defendants MUST PAY the portion (but in any case, no more than fifty percent (50%)) of the reasonable expenses associated with this instant Motion to Compel attrihibit Gonzales v City of Albuquerque Case Law, # (2) Exhibit Smith v Pizza Hut Inc Case Law, # (3) Exhibit Bouchard v Whetstone Case Law, # (4) Exhibit Miller v Kastelic)(bsimm, )
February 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Docket No. 91 is ACCEPTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) Sanctions Docket No. 83 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' request for default judgment as to all claims is denied. Plaintiffs' request directing certain matters or designated facts be taken as established for the purposes of this action is granted, to be addressed in further detail at a later date. Plaintiffs' request that defendants be prohibited from introducing designated matters is granted, to be addressed in further detail at a later date. Plaintiffs may file a motion for summary judgment on or before April 10, 2017. The Court awards plaintiffs reasonable expenses not already awarded by the magistrate judge, see Docket No. 90, associated with their attempts to secure responses to the interrogatories, including but not limited to attorneys fees and costs associated with the motion for sanctions. Any motion for fees and costs shall be filed on or before March 27, 2017. Defendants' Motion to Vacate This Case Docket No. 87 is denied, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/24/2017. (evana, )
September 20, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE that 106 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Justin Echon, Maribel Echon, Esmeraldo Villanueva Echon, Jr. be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/20/2017. (Attachments: # (1) - (7) Unpublished case law) (nywlc1)
November 1, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/01/2017, re: 116 The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accepted, re 106 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Justin Echon, Maribel Echon, Esmeraldo Villanueva Echon, Jr. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (sphil, )
January 11, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 01/11/2018. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 134 is accepted. Defendant William Sackett's Motion to Dismiss Witnesses 132, construed as a motion to exclude certain witnesses and construed in the alternative as a motion for judgment on the pleadings, is denied. (sphil, )
January 11, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 01/11/2018. ORDERED that defendants' Answer to Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Proposal to Remove Witnesses 137, which the Court construes as a Rule 72 objection to the magistrate judge's October 30, 2017 Recommendation and Order 134, is OVERRULED. (sphil, ) Modified on 1/12/2018 to correct linkage. (sphil, ).
February 2, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 02/02/2018, re: 184 Sanction Appeal filed by Leonida Sackett, William Sackett, is OVERRULED, 182 Request for Interpreter filed by Leonida Sackett, William Sackett, is DENIED. (sphil, )
February 9, 2018
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 196 Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration of Court's Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine No. 3. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/9/18. (pabsec)
May 4, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Esmeraldo Echon is entitled to $40,022 in unpaid wages under the Colorado Minimum Wage of Workers Act/Colorado Minimum Wage Order and the Colorado Wage Claim Act, 50% of which is awarded against William Sackett and 50% against Leonida Sackett. Esmeraldo Echon is entitled to $80,044 in non-economic damages for his claim of forced labor under 18 U.S.C. § 1589, 33% of which is awarded against William Sackett and 67% against Leonida Sackett. Esmeraldo Echon is entitled to $120,000 in punitive damages under 18 U.S.C. § 1589, 50% of which is awarded against William Sackett and 50% against Leonida Sackett. Maribel Echon is entitled to $14,811 in unpaid wages under the Colorado Minimum Wage of Workers Act/Colorado Minimum Wage Order and the Colorado Wage Claim Act, 50% of which is awarded against William Sackett and 50% against Leonida Sackett. Justin Echon is entitled to $15,678 in unpaid wages under the Colorado Minimum Wage of Workers Act/Colorado Minimum Wage Order and the Colorado Wage Claim Act, 50% of which is awarded against William Sackett and 50% against Leonida Sackett. Justin Echon is entitled to $31,366 in non-economic damages for his claim of forced labor under 18 U.S.C. § 1589, 33% of which is awarded against William Sackett and 67% against Leonida Sackett. Justin Echon is entitled to $30,000 in punitive damages under 18 U.S.C. § 1589, 50% of which is awarded against William Sackett and 50% against Leonida Sackett. Within 14 days of the entry of this Order, plaintiffs may have their costs by filing a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of the Court. This case is closed, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/4/18. (sgrim)