Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-3048 - Jones v. Archuleta et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-3048 - Jones v. Archuleta et al
June 8, 2017
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER. Applicant's Motion for Expansion of the Record 18 and Supplement to Reply to Pre-Answer Response 19 filed June 6, 2017 are not signed. Applicant is directed to correct this omission within twenty-one days from the date of this minute order or the documents will be stricken. The Court notes that Applicant indicates he previously filed a reply to Respondents' Pre-Answer Response 10. Applicant is advised that no reply has been filed in this action. Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 06/08/17. (jhawk, )
June 9, 2017
PDF | More
Minute Order. Applicant's Motion for Enlargement of Time 21 is GRANTED and the Court will consider Applicants arguments in the Reply to Pre-Answer Response [ 24] filed June 8, 2017. Applicant's Motion to Cure Deficiencies in Supplement to Reply to Pre-Answer Response 22 and Applicant's Motion to Cure Deficiencies in Motion for Expansion of the Record 23 are DENIED. If Applicant wants the Court to consider the documents that previously were submitted without signatures, he must submit new copies of those documents that are signed. Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 06/08/17. (jhawk, )
July 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER TO DISMISS IN PART AND FOR ANSWER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/5/17. 27 Motion for Expansion of the Record is granted, and 18 Motion for Expansion of the Record is denied. Respondents are directed to file an answer within thirty days, and within thirty days of the filing of the answer Applicant may file a reply. (dkals, ) Modified on 7/6/2017 to add text (dkals, ).
April 26, 2018
PDF | More
dge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/26/18. (sgrim)ORDER on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ORDERED that the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 1 is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. There is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Motion for Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing 45, Motion for Appointment of Counsel 44, and the motion 51 seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis in connection with the motion for appointment of counsel are denied, by Ju