Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-1036 - Chrisco v. Raemisch et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-1036 - Chrisco v. Raemisch et al
February 20, 2018
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 32 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sierra, Krakow, Ulysses Montoya, Spearing, Eslinger, Espinoza, Richard F. Raemisch, Shoffler, Collins, Cortez, Lynn Edward Travis, Pamela Jones, Gallardo, Richard Maley by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/20/2018. The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that Defendants Motion to Dismiss [filed July 31, 2017; docket #32] the Complaint be GRANTED. (mdave, )
March 27, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/27/2018, re: 32 defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED ; 94 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that plaintiff's first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and eighth claims for relief are dismissed to the extent that they assert constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. ORDERED that plaintiff's ninth, tenth, eleventh, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth claims for relief are dismissed. ORDERED that plaintiff's seventh claim for relief is dismissed to the extent that it asserts an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Jones. ORDERED that plaintiff's twelfth claim for relief is dismissed to the extent that it asserts an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Raemisch. ORDERED that the following claims will proceed: plaintiff's first claim for relief to the extent that it asserts a medical malpractice claim against defendant Krakow; plaintiff's second claim for relief to the extent that it asserts a medical malpractice claim against defendants Maley, Gibson, and Spearing; plaintiff's seventh claim for relief to the extent that it asserts an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Keys plaintiff's twelfth claim for relief to the extent that it asserts a Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Raemisch. (sphil, )
June 12, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 06/12/2018, re: 107 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (sphil, )
July 17, 2018
PDF | More
)RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/17/18 re 104 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Donald Gibson. The Court respectfully recommends that 104 Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. (nmarb,