Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

09-1499 - Tucker v. American Intl Group, Inc et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
09-1499 - Tucker v. American Intl Group, Inc et al
December 30, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER: See attached document. The Court will take no action with respect to the parties' Rule 26(f) report or defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint until their motion to transfer the case has been decided. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on December 30, 2009. (Kleysteuber, R.)
September 30, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER (see attached) on 18 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants' Motion is denied without prejudice as to their argument that Plaintiff lacks standing to sue under Connecticut's Direct Action Statute; and denied with prejudice with respect to their claims that (1) this action lies outside the scope of Bankruptcy Judge Gropper's order lifting the automatic stay and (2) AIG is an improper party. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 30, 2010. (Dorais, L.)
December 2, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER (see attached) denying in part and granting in part 88 Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate and Stay, or Alternatively for Protective Order and Motion for Rule 16(a) Conference. Defendants' motion to bifurcate and stay is denied, defendants' motion for a protective order is denied, and defendants' motion for a Rule 16(a) conference is granted. Moreover, in light of the settlement and disposition filed in Tucker I, the Court ORDERS plaintiff to amend her complaint to reflect the current state of facts in this action. Plaintiff shall efile her amended complaint on or before December 9, 2011, and defendants shall e-file their answer or response within twenty-one (21) days thereafter. The parties are ORDERED to meet forthwith and to file a Stipulation on or before December 16, 2011, setting forth a proposed schedule of the remaining depositions of witnesses to be taken. (See attached Order, p. 26.) Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on December 2, 2011. (Dorais, L.)
January 31, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER (see attached) memorializing the Court's findings based on the parties' statements during the January 19, 2012 status hearing and ruling on the following motions: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and For Attorney's Fees and Costs 52 is denied as moot; Plaintiff's Motion for Default or, In the Alternative, Other Sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c) 102 is denied without prejudice; Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order regarding the deposition of John Q. Doyle 75 is denied as moot; Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order and to Quash and/or Modify 101 is denied; Defendants' Motion to Compel the Deposition of Jeffrey Bagnell 108 is denied without prejudice; Plaintiff's Motion to Quash 115 is granted; and Defendants' Motion to Compel Supplemental Discovery Responses 120 is granted. Furthermore, the Court sets the following case deadlines: Discovery shall be completed on or before 3/1/2012; plaintiff shall file her response to 97 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 3/16/2012; and defendants shall file their reply to plaintiff's response, if any, on or before 3/26/2012. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 31, 2012. (Dorais, L.)
March 2, 2012
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying 139 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 2, 2012.(Dorais, L.)
March 2, 2012
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying Plaintiff's Emailed Request for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 2, 2012.(Dorais, L.)
March 15, 2012
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying 56 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Inspection of Third Party Marsh USA, Inc.'s Computer Records, and denying plaintiff's request for costs in retaining Datatrack Resources LLC. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 15, 2012. (Dorais, L.)
March 28, 2013
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying 128 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count Three of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, granting in part and denying in part 129 Defendants' Motion to Strike certain portions of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, and denying 144 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 28, 2013. (Dorais, L.)
January 28, 2015
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 97 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 97] is GRANTED in full as to Counts One, Two, Three, Five, and Six and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Count Four of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Doc. 126]. With respect to the claims alleged in Count Four (alleging violations by Defendants of the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-816(6) ("CUIPA"), via the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §42-110a, et seq. ("CUTPA")), the Court ORDERS the following further submissions: On or before February 20, 2015, Plaintiff is directed to file and serve a letter, stating whether she intends to press all or any of the claimed CUIPA/CUTPA violations in Count Four or whether she has abandoned those claims in their entirety. Plaintiff's letter must specify which, if any, claims under Count Four are pressed. If Plaintiff's letter declares her intention to press any of the CUIPA/CUTPA claims, and Defendants are advised to move for summary judgment on those claims, Defendants are directed to file and serve papers, including a memorandum of authorities, in support of such motion on or before March 13, 2015. In that event, Plaintiff must file and serve opposing papers on or before March 24, 2015; and Defendants may file and serve reply papers, if so advised, on or before March 31, 2015. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendants with respect to Counts One, Two, Three, Five, and Six of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 28, 2015. (Dorais, L.)
April 5, 2016
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting in part and denying in part 170 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's CUIPA/CUTPA claim. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 38a-816(6) (B), (E), (G), and (N); and DENIED as to Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 38a-816(6) (C) and (D). The parties shall file their joint trial memorandum on or before May 5, 2016, and the case will be trial ready on June 6, 2016. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 5, 2016. (Dorais, L.)