Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

09-1754 - Kopperl v. Bain et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
09-1754 - Kopperl v. Bain et al
November 9, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER Regarding Insufficiency of Jurisdictional Allegations. (See attached.) Plaintiff is directed to file and serve an amended complaint not later than November 30, 2009, containing sufficient jurisdictional allegations with respect to himself and Defendants. Plaintiff is also ordered to serve a copy of this order on Defendants on or before November 30, 2009. All proceedings in the case are STAYED pending the filing of an amended complaint in conformity with this Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 9, 2009. (Lacedonia, J.)
August 30, 2010
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims of Certain Defendants. All counterclaims except Count Two are dismissed. However, leave to replead is granted with respect to all counterclaims except Counts One and Nine. Any repleaded counterclaims must be filed and served not later than September 22, 2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on August 30, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
January 17, 2012
PDF | More
RULING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES: counsel shall forward a status report, either jointly or individually, to this Magistrate Judge's Chambers with respect to their progress by 1/31/2012. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 1/17/2012. (Rodko, B.)
May 1, 2014
PDF | More
Ruling on Pending Discovery Motions: 55 Motion for Protective Order is granted in limited part, without prejudice to reconsideration if Judge Haight reinstates Count Nine of defendants' Amended Counterclaims at a later time; and 59 Motion for Protective Order and 59 Motion to Quash are granted also without prejudice to reconsideration if Judge Haight reinstates Count Nine of defendants' Amended Counterclaims at a later time. See Attached. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 5/1/2014. (Watson, M.)
May 6, 2014
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying 38 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of 35 Ruling on 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Amended Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 6, 2014. (Dorais, L.)
June 2, 2014
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting in part and denying in part 36 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. If Plaintiff decides to further amend his Complaint in a manner consistent with the attached Ruling, he must file the amended pleading on or before June 27, 2014. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 2, 2014. (Dorais, L.)
January 26, 2016
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying Plaintiff's [Doc. 93] Motion for Reconsideration and granting Defendants' [Doc. 100] Motion to Dismiss Fourteenth and Fifteenth Counts of Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Verified Complaint. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 26, 2016. (Overbey, C.)