Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

10-654 - Golodner et al v. New London et al

Download Files


Document in Context
10-654 - Golodner et al v. New London et al
January 25, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION. Although plaintiffs have proven that Golodner engaged in protected speech and that they sustained adverse action as a result of defendants' actions with respect to initiating a bidding process and awarding the alarm services contract to another company, I conclude that plaintiffs have not carried their burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that any adverse actions were motivated in whole or in part by any intent to retaliate against protected speech. Accordingly, judgment shall enter for defendants. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/25/2016.(Oakes, A.)