Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-1827 - Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-1827 - Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. et al
November 30, 2010
PDF | More
RULING granting 10 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Christopher F. Droney on 11/30/2010. (Gothers, M.)(9 pages)
June 15, 2011
PDF | More
RULING denying without prejudice 57 Motion to Amend the Complaint. Signed by Judge Christopher F. Droney on 6/14/2011. (Gothers, M.)(7 pages)
February 8, 2012
PDF | More
Ruling and ORDER denying 67 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Signed by Judge Mark R. Kravitz on 2/8/12. (Brown, S.)
March 24, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 281 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 03/24/2014. (Bonneau, J)
June 27, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 6/27/2014.(Garguilo, B)
July 2, 2014
PDF | More
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 6/27/14.(Torday, B.)
August 8, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion 472 for Judgment as a Matter of Law and for a New Trial is GRANTED, in that judgment will be entered against Defendants Macy's, Inc. and Macy's Retail, Inc. with respect to trademark infringement, and DENIED in all other respects. Defendants' "Conditional" Motion 475 for Judgment as a Matter of Law and for a New Trial is DENIED without prejudice to renewal if the Court's ruling with respect to the willfulness requirement is overturned on appeal and the Court subsequently determines based on the equitable factors that Plaintiff is entitled to an award of Fossil's profits for trademark infringement. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 08/08/2014. (Bonneau, J)
August 14, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application 450 for Attorney's Fees and Costs is GRANTED in part, and Plaintiff's Motion 378 for Supplemental Relief is DENIED. Plaintiff is entitled to recover its reasonable fees and costs under CUTPA and the Patent Act. However, Plaintiff is not entitled to recover its fees under the Lanham Act, and thus may not recover any fees incurred exclusively in pursuit of Romag's claim for an award of Defendants' profits in connection with its trademark infringement claims. Plaintiff also may not recover its non-taxable costs under CUTPA. Finally, as this Court ruled in its memorandum of decision after the bench trial, Plaintiff may not recover its costs and fees related to its pursuit of a TRO in this case. In light of the existing scheduling order with respect to the fee petition, Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's Motion 466 to Compel shall be filed no later than seven days after the issuance of this opinion. Any reply shall be filed within seven days of the filing of the opposition. In light of the Court's rulings excluding certain categories of fees--i.e., (1) fees incurred in pursuing the TRO, (2) fees incurred solely in pursuit of Plaintiff's Lanham Act claim for an award of Defendants' profits, and (3) non-taxable costs under CUTPA--Defendants are directed to submit a supplemental opposition limited to identifying objections to specific fees falling within those categories within seven days of the Court's ruling on the Motion to Compel. Plaintiff shall file its substantive reply within fourteen days of Defendants' supplemental opposition, or within fourteen days of Defendants' compliance with the Motion to Compel, if granted, whichever date is later. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 08/14/2014. (Bonneau, J)
December 10, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 466 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/10/14. (Tooker, A.)
September 30, 2015
PDF | More
Ruling on Plaintiff's Motions for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 9/30/15.(Tooker, A.) Modified on 10/2/2015 (Villano, P.).
March 28, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion 508 for Attorneys' Fees is GRANTED with modification. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/28/16. (Harris, J)
August 16, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, Plaintiff's Request 543 for Reinstatement of Patent Act Attorney's Fees and Costs and an Award of Lanham Act Attorney's Fees and Costs is DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/16/18.(Denker, J.)
October 15, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached order, Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 556 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/15/18. (Davis, Caroline)