Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-704 - Genn v. New Haven Board of Education et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-704 - Genn v. New Haven Board of Education et al
January 2, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER (see attached) - The Court is not in a position to evaluate the contentions contained within the Parties' Supplemental Memoranda, 20 and 21, or to apply governing case law to the facts of the case at bar, until Plaintiff makes known in detail the contents of the additional evidence she wishes to submit. Plaintiff is therefore directed to file and serve under seal (for privacy purposes) affidavits executed by all witnesses from whom Plaintiff wishes to elicit additional evidence to supplement the administrative record. Those affidavits should be in the form that Plaintiff would wish the Court to consider on cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendants may then file such objections to that evidence as they may be advised to make. The Court will resolve the issues and the case will then be ready for summary judgment practice under Rule 56, Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff must file and serve all affidavits consistent with this Order on or before Friday, January 17, 2014. Defendants must file and serve any objections to the admission of those proffered affidavits on or before Friday, January 31, 2014. Any opposition must be accompanied by a memorandum of legal authorities. Plaintiff may file a reply to Defendants' objections on or before Friday, February 7, 2014. Any reply must be accompanied by a memorandum of legal authorities. Cross-motions for summary judgment must be filed and served two weeks after the date of the Court's Ruling on Defendants' objections to Plaintiff's proffer of additional evidence. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 1/2/14.(Hornstein, A)
March 11, 2015
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) on Defendants' 25 OBJECTION to Plaintiff's 23 Proffer of Additional Evidence. Defendants' objection to Plaintiff's proffer of additional evidence is SUSTAINED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's proffer is REJECTED and will not be considered by the Court. In accordance with the Court's 22 Order, cross-motions for summary judgment must be filed and served on or before March 25, 2015. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 11, 2015. (Pylman, J.)
November 30, 2016
PDF | More
Ruling (see attached) granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 30, 2016. (Overbey, C.)
May 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER (see attached) denying, without prejudice, Plaintiff's 50 Motion for Award of Attorney Fees, for failure to comply with this Court's prior 49 Ruling, which authorized its submission. If Plaintiff wishes to recover attorney fees in this matter, she is directed to file, on or before Friday, June 9, 2017, affidavits and submissions in compliance with the attached Order, and with the instructions provided in this Court's prior 49 Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 15, 2017. (Pskowski, R.)
July 17, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER (see attached) granting, as modified, Plaintiff's 53 Amended Motion for Award of Attorney Fees. The Defendants are thereby ORDERED to transmit to the Plaintiff the amount of $1,008.00, representing reasonable attorney's fees as to the single substantive issue on which Plaintiff prevailed. Defendants must certify with the Court, by affidavit, full compliance with the terms of this ruling on or before Monday, July 31, 2017. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 17, 2017. (Pskowski, R.)