Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-718 - Doe et al v. Mastoloni et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-718 - Doe et al v. Mastoloni et al
May 29, 2014
PDF | More
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting, upon Plaintiffs' consent, 14 Motion for Modification of Motion to Seal by Defendant Avon Public Schools ("Avon"). Defendant Avon represents that Plaintiff "'Jane Doe' may be a participant in other litigation in which upcoming settlement proceedings are scheduled." Avon thus requests modification of the Court's prior 7 Order, dated 5/21/2014, which sealed Plaintiffs' unredacted Complaint and prohibited Defendants and their counsel "from disclosing to anyone the true identities of the three Plaintiffs" and the "two older daughters" related to them. In particular, Avon now requests that the 7 Order to seal be modified to permit Jane Doe's identity to be revealed solely during the upcoming settlement proceedings in the other litigation. Avon represents that Plaintiffs' counsel has indicated that Plaintiffs consent to the modification provided that "any non-attorneys and/or non-judicial officers who participate in those settlement negotiations will sign the Confidentiality Pledge" attached to Avon's 14 Motion as Exhibit A. See Doc. 14-1. Under these circumstances, pursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 5(e)(6), the Court grants Avon's consented-to 14 Motion, thereby modifying the Court's 7 Order to seal by allowing revelation of Jane Doe's identity: (1) solely for the described purpose of -- i.e., within the context of -- settlement negotiations in the other litigation and (2) upon the condition that non-attorneys and/or non-judicial officers who participate in said negotiations sign the attached "Confidentiality Pledge." All other terms of the Court's prior 7 Order to seal remain in effect. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 29, 2014. (Dorais, L.)
May 22, 2015
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying, without prejudice to re-filing, the Avon Faculty Defendants' 88 Motion to Dismiss and Revoke Admission Pro Hac Vice and Plaintiffs' 92 and 98 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 22, 2015. (Pylman, J.)
January 28, 2016
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting Defendants' [Docs. 103, 104, 105, and 106] Motions to Compel. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 26, 2016. (Overbey, C.)
February 12, 2016
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting Plaintiffs' 67 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint and granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 72 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' are directed to file an Amended Complaint that comports with this Ruling on or before March 14, 2016. Defendants' Answer must be filed on or before April 14, 2016. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 12, 2016. (Overbey, C.)