Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1897 - CSL Silicones, Inc v. Midsun Group Inc


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1897 - CSL Silicones, Inc v. Midsun Group Inc
March 15, 2016
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) GRANTING Defendant's 11 Motion for Judicial Notice and GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss. As discussed in the attached Ruling, at 22-23, the Court also DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant's 39 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Defendant's 40 Motion for Protective Order. The parties are directed to confer regarding the status of the issues related to the latter two motions, and, if Defendant so chooses, it may re-file either or both motions on or before March 25, 2016. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 15, 2016. (White, B.)
April 1, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting defendant's 61 Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order, and denying plaintiff's 62 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. The Court hereby enters the following Amended Scheduling Order: fact discovery due by October 31, 2016; all discovery, including expert depositions, due by November 30, 2016; dispositive motions due by December 13, 2016. See attached Order for other interim deadlines. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/1/2016. (Katz, S.)
June 27, 2016
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying Defendant's 64 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 27, 2016. (White, B.)
June 27, 2016
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying Defendant's 60 Renewed Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 27, 2016. (White, B.)
April 18, 2017
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) regarding Plaintiff's [Docs. 82-83]. For the reasons stated in the attached Ruling, Defendant is ORDERED to transmit to Plaintiff $15,705 in attorneys' fees. Defendant is further directed to certify with the Court, in the form of an affidavit, its full compliance with the terms of this Ruling on or before June 16, 2017. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 18, 2017. (Kahl, A)
December 7, 2017
PDF | More
RULING (see attached). For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, Plaintiff CSL Silicones, Inc.'s 166 Motion to Exclude Defendant's Proposed Expert on Likelihood of Confusion is GRANTED IN PART. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 12/7/2017. (Kaczmarek, S.)
March 15, 2018
PDF | More
RULING (see attached). For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, CSL's 170 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; CSL's 120 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Midsun's 163 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and for Judicial Notice is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and Midsun's 160 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. The parties are directed to file a joint trial memorandum in the form required by this Court's Standing Order Regarding Trial Memoranda in Civil Cases on or before May 14, 2018. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 3/15/2018. (Kaczmarek, S.)