Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-2516 - In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-2516 - In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
March 23, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: For reasons discussed herein,(1) Teva Israel's motion to dismiss all complaints against it under Rule 12(b)(2) 150 is granted without prejudice; (2) the defendants' motion to dismiss the direct-purchaser complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) 149 is denied in substantial part; (3) the defendants' motion to dismiss the indirect-purchaser complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) 151 is granted in part and denied in part; and (4) the defendants' motion to dismiss the Humana complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) 152 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/23/2015. (Pollack, R.)
July 21, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER:The defendants' motion (doc. 236) to certify the March 23, 2015 Order (doc. 229) for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is granted. The March 23 order, as expanded and clarified by this order, is certified for interlocutory review. If a party wishes to pursue that appeal, that party has ten days from the date of this order to apply for review to the Second Circuit, which may, in its discretion, grant review on any portion of the order or none at all.The defendants do not seek a stay of the district court proceedings, and I do not grant one. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/21/2015. (Pollack, R.)
August 8, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER on Relevant Market Definition:holding that the relevant market in this case is determined by the nature of the challenged agreement, that the only relevant market in this litigation is therefore the market of Aggrenox and its generic equivalents, and that no discovery or evidence relating to other drugs as potential substitutes is relevant;certifying for discretionary appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b); denying 348, 354, 363, 411 discovery motions. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/8/2016. (Pollack, R.)
August 9, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER, granting in part and denying in part 290, 291, 374 Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/9/2016. (Pollack, R.)
January 9, 2017
PDF | More
MANDATE - Petitioners move, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1292(b), for leave to appeal an interlocutory order of the district court. The nonparty movants move to file amicus curiae briefs. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED the motions to file amicus briefs are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the petition is DENIED. Signed by Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk on 1/9/2017. (Oliver, T.)
October 18, 2017
PDF | More
RULING AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 594 MOTION for Attorneys' Fees. The motion is granted up to the amount of $20,000 (which has already been paid), and otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/18/2017. (Jamieson, K)
November 29, 2017
PDF | More
RULING AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 643 MOTION to Compel. (Jamieson, K)
February 12, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER denying 744 MOTION to Certify 735 ORDER on Motion to Compel for Interlocutory Appeal. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/12/2018. (Jamieson, K)
March 6, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER granting 748 MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Settlement; denying 755 MOTION to Strike; granting 762 MOTION to Seal. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/06/2018. (Jamieson, K)