Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-785 - FIH, LLC v. Foundation Capital Partners, LLC et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-785 - FIH, LLC v. Foundation Capital Partners, LLC et al
March 30, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/30/16. (Harris, J)
April 26, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting 65 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 66 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 4/26/16. (Harris, J)
May 18, 2016
PDF | More
ENDORSEMENT ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 5/18/16.(Harris, J)
July 28, 2016
PDF | More
RULING denying in large part (Dkt. #118) Defendants' Motion to Continue to the extent that it seeks to cancel the August 4-5, 2016 PJR Hearing, and granting Defendants' Motion to Continue in limited part to the extent that continued hearing dates may be scheduled in late October; and denying in part (Dkt. #121) Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Protective Order to the extent that it seeks to postpone the August 1-2, 2016 depositions, but granting Plaintiff's Emergency Motione the requested limitations in appropriate motions to be filed with the Court during the remaining discovery period. (See Attached). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/28/2016. (Watson, M.) for Protective Order to the extent that the subject matter of the depositions is limited to any issues that will be raised at the PJR hearing; counsel will not be hampered by any of the conditions demanded by any of the parties, and counsel may rais
January 31, 2018
PDF | More
f's state-law claims are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/31/2018. (Kolker, J.)ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's Motion 174 for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendants' Motions 173 176 178 179 for Summary Judgment are GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal claim. Plaintif