Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-965 - Cisco Technology, Inc. v. Certification Trendz LTD. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-965 - Cisco Technology, Inc. v. Certification Trendz LTD. et al
June 26, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 4 Ex Parte Motion For (1) Temporary Restraining Order Enjoining Distribution of Cisco Products and Enjoining Transfer of Defendants' Domain Names, (2) Temporary Order Impounding Cisco Products, and (3) Order to Show Cause. The parties are ordered to appear on 7/7/15 at 11:00 a.m. and show cause why this Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Impoundment Order should not remain in effect. The Court notes that Plaintiff has been directed to file proof of bond in the amount of $10,000.00. The Plaintiff shall promptly serve a copy of this Order upon the Defendants. See attached Order. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 6/26/15. (De Palma, C)
June 26, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 7 Ex Parte Motion for (1) Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Defendants' Financial Accounts and Assets, And (2) Order to Show Cause. The parties are ordered to appear on 7/7/15 at 11:00 a.m. and show cause why the account(s) that is/are the subject of this Order should not remain frozen pending an evidentiary hearing or further order of the Court. The Court notes that Plaintiff has been directed to file proof of bond in the amount of $10,000.00. The Plaintiff shall promptly serve a copy of this Order upon the Defendants. See attached Order. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 6/26/15. (De Palma, C)
March 25, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying Defendants' 49 Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING Plaintiff's 63 Motion to Amend. See attached memorandum of opinion. The Court clarifies its Order at Docket No. 84 to GRANT Plaintiff's Motion to Amend as discussed in the attached opinion. The parties are advised that the Court continues to examine the issues raised with regard to the preliminary injunction. The discovery disputes and contempt motion will be reviewed by this Court after the parties have met in good faith to narrow and clarify the issues necessitating Court intervention. The referral to Judge Richardson for a discovery conference will be vacated. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/25/16. (Shechter, N.)