Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1618 - Conquistador v. Hartford Police Department et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1618 - Conquistador v. Hartford Police Department et al
November 30, 2015
PDF | More
RECOMMENDED RULING denying without prejudice to refiling 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing with prejudice 1 Complaint as to defendant Hartford Police Department; and dismissing without prejudice 1 Complaint as to the individual defendants. See attached ruling for details. 10 Pages. Objections due by 12/14/2015 Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 11/30/15.(Esposito, A.)
March 13, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' 60 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The claims against the Hartford Police Department are DISMISSED with prejudice. The claims against the City of Hartford and the defendant Officers are DISMISSED without prejudice. In light of the plaintiff's pro se status, the Court will give the plaintiff one more chance to amend his complaint to properly state a claim in accordance with the Court's ruling. Should plaintiff wish to do so, he may file an amended complaint that set forth the basis for the Court's jurisdiction and sufficient facts, accepted as true, that state a claim for relief by April 13, 2017.Plaintiff's 48 Motion to Compel, 51 Motion for Conference, 62 Motion to Compel, 64 Motion to Compel, 65 Motion to Appoint Counsel, 70 Motion to Compel, 73 Motion to Amend/Correct, 78 Motion to Compel, and 80 Motion for Default Judgment are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/13/2017. (Connelly, L.)
November 8, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER. The 86 Motion to Amend/Correct the Complaint is GRANTED. However, the 87 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint is also GRANTED. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the plaintiff's amended complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The amended complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The case will remain closed. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/8/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)