Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-260 - Jansson v. Stamford Health, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-260 - Jansson v. Stamford Health, Inc. et al
April 5, 2017
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 59 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff may file her proposed "Amended Complaint," consistent with the terms of this Ruling, on or before Friday, April 28, 2017. The Court also DENIES (without prejudice to reinstatement) Defendants' 25 26 Motions to Dismiss, which addressed the prior Complaint, and the parties' discovery motions [Doc. 66, 92, 98, 99, 106, 122, 128, 131, 134, 135, and 137] for the same reason. The parties may each file an omnibus motion containing all outstanding discovery concerns and/or issues to be decided in a hearing the Court will then schedule on all discovery matters in this case. [The parties' 136 Joint Motion for Status Conference, or in the Alternative, A Referral of Pending Discovery Motions to Magistrate Judge is thus DENIED as moot at this time.] On or before Friday, May 12, 2017, the parties are directed to file a joint amended Rule 26(f) Report, reflecting the state of present discovery and proposing any revised case deadlines they believe are necessary in light of this Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 5, 2017. (Dorais, L.)
March 30, 2018
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting in part and denying in part 150 Plaintiff's Third Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff must file a final "Revised Amended Complaint," consistent with the terms of this Ruling on or before Friday, April 27, 2018. The period for amendment of the pleadings is hereby CLOSED as of the entry of this Ruling. On or before Friday, May 11, 2018, the parties must meet and/or confer and file a joint amended Rule 26(f) Report, reflecting the state of present discovery and proposing any revised case deadlines they believe are necessary in light of this Ruling. The Clerk is directed to terminate the following defendants immediately: VantagePoint, LLC and Sharon Kiely. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 30, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
April 11, 2018
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) granting 211 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff must file her Revised Amended Complaint in conformance with this Ruling on or before April 27, 2018. Upon filing of that revised pleading, the Clerk is instructed to reinstate VantagePoint as a defendant on the case docket in this action.Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 11, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
May 7, 2018
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) provisionally granting 190 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Request for In Camera Inspection. On or before June 1, 2018, Defendants Stamford Hospital and Stamford Anesthesiology Services, P.C. may, if so advised, submit additional papers in support of a claim that certain particular documents forming the subject matter of the motion are protected by an evidentiary privilege. (See discussion in attached Ruling re: requisite showings to claim attorney-client and work product privileges and to prove "joint defense agreement"). If such additional submissions are made, setting forth a show of privilege as to each document at issue, the Court will enter a further scheduling order for the submission of responsive papers by Plaintiff. If Defendants do not file such additional papers by June 1, the Court's provisional granting of Plaintiff's motion to compel will become absolute, and Defendants will be required to produce the documents in question to Plaintiff at that time. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 7, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
May 24, 2018
PDF | More
RULING (see attached) denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 24, 2018. (Dorais, L.)