Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-398 - Moore v. Bouffard et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-398 - Moore v. Bouffard et al
December 29, 2016
PDF | More
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915A. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court enters the following orders:(1) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Robert Bouffard are DISMISSED with prejudice.(2) Plaintiff's claims against defendants John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 may proceed at this time. But because the Clerk of Court is unable to serve process on the Doe defendants until plaintiff identifies them by their first and last names, plaintiff must promptly take steps to learn the names of these officers, and plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 60 days--by March 1, 2017--naming these officers as defendants. If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by March 1, 2017, or to timely seek a further extension based upon good cause for more time to file an amended complaint, then plaintiff is advised that the Court will dismiss this action for failure of plaintiff to prosecute his claims. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/29/2016. (Gruber, Sarah)
January 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. #18) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/24/2017. (Levenson, C.)