Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-2099 - Tuttle v. Semple et al

Download Files


Document in Context
17-2099 - Tuttle v. Semple et al
March 6, 2018
PDF | More
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915A. As stated in the attached ruling, because the Court concludes that plaintiff's complaint only alleges one plausible claim against one defendant, Officer Johnson, the Court will grant plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint in this case if he believes he can state a plausible claim of denial of access to the courts. If he chooses to file an amended complaint restating his claim for denial of access to the courts, plaintiff must explain in detail how the actions of each defendant caused him actual injury according to the principles set forth in the attached ruling. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, the case will proceed only on the retaliation claim against Officer Johnson, and the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to effect service accordingly. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/6/2018. (Zuckier, C.)