Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-21209 - Alvarez v. C. R. Bard, Inc.

Download Files


Document in Context
17-21209 - Alvarez v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
January 28, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER Plaintiffs' 89 Omnibus Motion re: Non-Retained Corporate Experts is DENIED; Plaintiffs' 88 Omnibus Motion re: Physician Experts is DENIED; C. R. Bard's 90 Motion to Exclude is DENIED; C. R. Bard's 96 Omnibus Motion is DENIED; and Plaintiffs' 98 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. The parties have leave to file additional expert-specific Daubert motions and the court will modify an existing PTO to reflect these deadlines. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 1/28/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 44 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the plaintiff's claims for manufacturing defect, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, and negligent inspection, packaging, marketing, and selling. The 44 Motion is otherwise DENIED. The 42 Partial Motion for Summary Judgment on Punitive Damages is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/21/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)