Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-088 - DAKER v. BRYSON et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-088 - DAKER v. BRYSON et al
August 20, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 4 Motion to Expedite; denying as moot 7 Motion to Certify a Constitutional Challenge ; denying as moot 8 Motion Showing that Plaintiff either does not have three strikes or that he is in imminent danger; and Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 8/20/15 (lap)
February 17, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING 16 19 and 20 Motions for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 2/17/2016. (tlh)
June 8, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 26 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by WASEEM DAKER, 24 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by WASEEM DAKER, 25 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by WASEEM DAKER. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs Motions (Docs. 24, 25,26) be DENIED. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 06/07/2016. (cma)
February 2, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER adopting 28 Report and Recommendations; denying 24 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 26 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 32 Motion for Limited Service of Process. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 2/2/2017 (lap)
April 20, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 36 Motion to Vacate. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 4/20/2017 (lap)
May 9, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 41 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 5/9/17 (lap)
October 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying as moot 52 Motion to Expedite; denying 53 Motion for Recusal. The Court REMANDS Plaintiffs claims to the United States Magistrate Judge who is instructed to conduct the initial review of Plaintiffs Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and § 1915(e) in a reasonably timely manner. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 10/24/2017 (lap)
March 16, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER finding as moot 62 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 63 Emergency Motion; denying 66 Motion for Recusal; denying 69 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 72 Motion to access authorities; denying 75 Motion for copies; denying 76 Motion for Recusal. Plaintiff with an additional FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this Order to supplement his Objections. The Court DEFERS ruling on Plaintiffs remaining pending motions and the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation until the time for supplementation has expired. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 3/16/2018 (lap)