Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-077 - PATE v. PRECHECK INC


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-077 - PATE v. PRECHECK INC
March 7, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER DENYING 5 Motion to Remand. Pate is NOTIFIED of his right to amend his complaint and submit a response brief. As explained above, if Pate fails to amend his complaint and the applicable statute of limitations has expired since he filed the original complaint, the Pate will be barred from refiling following dismissal. If Pate fails to file a brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss, a final judgment may be rendered against him if otherwise appropriate under law. Any amendment or response brief must be filed WITHIN 21 DAYS of the date Pate was served with Precheck's motion to dismiss. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B); M.D. Ga. Civ. R. 7.2. Thereafter, the Court will consider Prechecks motion to dismiss and any opposition to the same filed by Pate and issue its ruling. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/7/2017. (tlh)