Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-023 - Pelayo v. Platinum Limousine Services, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-023 - Pelayo v. Platinum Limousine Services, Inc. et al
September 30, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' 45 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 9/30/2015. ~ The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Count 1 claim under HRS ยง 388-2 and Count 2 claim for conversion. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
December 30, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 63 MOTION TO CONDITIONALLY CERTIFY A COLLECTIVE AND FOR AN ORDER OF NOTICE TO THE CLASS; AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/30/2015. ~ The Court will hold the parties' pending motions for summary judgment in abeyance pending further settlement discussions directed by a concurrently-filed Entering Order. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
June 6, 2016
PDF | More
dress listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. Modified to associate Magistrate Kenneth Mansfield to F & R on 6/7/2016 (ecs, ). FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART PLAINTIFFS' 124 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH MANSFIELD DERRICK K. WATSON on 6/6/2016. - The Court FINDS and RECOMMENDS that the Plaintiffs' Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. First, the Court RECOMMENDS approving the underlying settlement. Second, the Court RECOMMENDS awarding Plaintiffs $53,517.36 in attorneys' fees and $3,131.76 in costs. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail ad
September 27, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART 134 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART PLAINTIFF' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 9/27/2016. The Court ADOPTS in part and MODIFIES in part the Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. The Court awards Plaintiffs attorneys' fees of $44,785.58 and costs of $3,131.76. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry Modified docket title text on 9/28/2016 (ecs, ).
January 5, 2018
PDF | More
eceive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry ORDER REVERSING IN PART THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OCTOBER 19, 2017 ORDER re 166, 168 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 1/5/2018. "For the foregoing reasons, the Court REVERSES IN PART the October 19, 2017 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 69(a)(2) or Alternatively, the Posting of a Supersedeas Bond. The Court ORDERS Defendants to pay $8,740.83 in fees to Plaintiffs' counsel related to Defendants' failure to comply with discovery as detailed above and in the Magistrate Judge's October 19, 2017 Order." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to r