Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-055 - Kim v. Kanazawa


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-055 - Kim v. Kanazawa
March 12, 2018
PDF | More
lectronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING CLARIFICATION re(201) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC; re (179) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 03/12/2018. Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC, 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC(eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document e
May 18, 2018
PDF | More
n all other respects. In addition, Plaintiffs' request to reopen their case to call Plaintiff Shizuko Green as a witness is DENIED. Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC, 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC (emt, )ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW re (385) in case 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC; re (362) in case 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 5/18/2018. Specifically, the Motion is GRANTED as to: the claims in Plaintiffs' complaints based on the Lockout and the 2013 Settlement Agreement; and Plaintiffs' request for punitive damages. Defendants' Motion is DENIED i
May 21, 2018
PDF | More
is not supported by law and therefore not permissible, Defendants' request is HEREBY GRANTED. Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC, 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC (emt, )ORDER RULING ON MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR RESCISSION re (361 in 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC, 384 in 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC), (399 in 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC, 376 in 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC), (330 in 1:16-cv-00055-LEK-KSC,[ 353] in 1:16-cv-00054-LEK-KSC) - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 5/21/2018. For the foregoing reasons, the Court rules as follows: (1) to the extent Plaintiffs seek reconsideration of the Court's rulings regarding measure of damages, Plaintiffs' request for reconsideration is HEREBY DENIED; (2) as to Defendants' request that the measure of damages include monetary value for every day since February 9, 2010 to the present, regardless of whether the unit was rented, personally used, or remained vacant, Defendants' request is HEREBY DENIED; (3) as to Defendants' request that the Court rule that Plaintiffs must prove actual damages to recover on a legal malpractice claim and thus recovery of lost investment opportunity is speculative and not permissible, Defendants' request is HEREBY GRANTED; and (4) as to Defendants' request that the Court rule that recovery of depreciation in this instance